Very, very important note here folks: The assertion made by this twitter account is not sourced nor corroborated anywhere.
2nd time I've had to say this tonight: Be careful with this one.
Guys, we need to do better than this. It's fine to link to this tweet and draw attention to it, but it has to be called out that there's no source and no corroboration by anyone.
I like the Wall Street Apes account, they post some good info and they're fighting the good fight. But they also put stuff out there that never gets verified and makes us all look bad.
Wow. Second Time, Jackie. I see these X posts just being copy/pasted here, and far too many frogs jump in to comment without (apparently) even considering
Is this sourced?
Where is the sauce? What are the facts? On what is this assertion this based?
I just ran a quick search for
"Ryan Routh garland assassination"
And NOTHING comes up, except for days old reports on what Routh was charged with at the time.
People also need to apply critical thinking.
People HAVE to be charged according to the law and the evidence. you cannot just go ahead and charge someone with attempted assassination because it seems clear this was their intent. That's not how the law works. Conspiracy to commit assassination, probably. But no actual attempt was made. So you cannot charge someone with attempted assassination of the attempt was not made.
Conspiracy, yes. Planning yes, intent even, could legally be proved. But no attempt was actually made, as far as I know.
The Banana Republic issue that Potus consistently raises is when the law is weaponized against someone. DJT is the president of Law and Order, and patriots need to remember that. Otherwise, you become the very monster you despise.
Very, very important note here folks: The assertion made by this twitter account is not sourced nor corroborated anywhere.
2nd time I've had to say this tonight: Be careful with this one.
Guys, we need to do better than this. It's fine to link to this tweet and draw attention to it, but it has to be called out that there's no source and no corroboration by anyone.
I like the Wall Street Apes account, they post some good info and they're fighting the good fight. But they also put stuff out there that never gets verified and makes us all look bad.
Wow. Second Time, Jackie. I see these X posts just being copy/pasted here, and far too many frogs jump in to comment without (apparently) even considering
Is this sourced?
Where is the sauce? What are the facts? On what is this assertion this based?
I just ran a quick search for
"Ryan Routh garland assassination"
And NOTHING comes up, except for days old reports on what Routh was charged with at the time.
People also need to apply critical thinking.
People HAVE to be charged according to the law and the evidence. you cannot just go ahead and charge someone with attempted assassination because it seems clear this was their intent. That's not how the law works. Conspiracy to commit assassination, probably. But no actual attempt was made. So you cannot charge someone with attempted assassination of the attempt was not made.
Conspiracy, yes. Planning yes, intent even, could legally be proved. But no attempt was actually made, as far as I know.
The Banana Republic issue that Potus consistently raises is when the law is weaponized against someone. DJT is the president of Law and Order, and patriots need to remember that. Otherwise, you become the very monster you despise.
'no actual attempt was made. ' ' DJT is the president of Law and Order'
yes!! i've been saying this myself.....everywhere i can