Here's an industry LEGALLY IMMUNE FROM BEING SUED over the health or safety of their products and "regulated" by an agency (the FCC) that is actually composed of its own former executives and other employees. Where have we seen THAT before?
Disclosure: I LOVE technology, have a smartphone, use wireless WiFi, and yet am concerned enough about this to at least not use anything with 5G capability. I suspect that the harm from EMF is substantially lower than that from the jabs (that seems clear, actually), but believe that 5G in particular can be weaponized to cause far more harm than even shown in the studies that have found damage from EMF.
And even "lower levels of harm" ARE HARMFUL. It doesn't matter how low the likelihood of harm IS when YOU or SOMEONE YOU CARE ABOUT gets hurt. Death by lightning strike is very rare, but for those killed or badly injured, it happens 100%.
https://thelibertydaily.com/former-big-tech-exec-warns-serious-dangers-linked/
With Apple releasing its latest generation of iPhones this week, it’s important to keep in mind that the wireless technology in cell phones, tablets and other devices is not nearly as safe as we’d like to think. The convenience of being connected to endless information and communication tools is something few of us can resist, yet the price we pay could be devastating.
Former Microsoft Canada President Frank Clegg, who currently serves on the Environmental Health Trust business advisory group and as the chief executive of Canadians for Safe Technology, has been warning for years about the dangers of 5G wireless technology, and he has been pressing telecommunications companies to prove that it is safe.
In an educational video, Clegg shared research and data showing the potential impacts of wireless technologies on human health. “I’ve seen the tremendous benefit that technology can provide; I’ve also seen the potential harm if technology is not implemented correctly … I am especially concerned about our current implementation of 5G wireless technology, and the more research I do and the more experts I talk to, the more concerned I become,” he said.
Clegg, who has more than four decades of experience in the tech sector, highlighted one fact that tells you everything you need to know about 5G: “I am not aware of a single study that shows that 5G technology is safe,” he cautioned.
He also pointed out that more than 230 researchers and scientists from dozens of countries sent a formal letter to the UN and the World Health Organization outlining their reservations about the rollout of 5G wireless technology.
The main concern is the fact that it gives off RF radiation, which the human body absorbs and accumulates. It has already been linked to a slew of problems via hundreds of studies demonstrating biological harm. A 2018 study by the National Institute of Health’s National Toxicology Program uncovered evidence of cancer and damage to DNA from the use of wireless devices.
The technology has been linked to diabetes, infertility, headaches, insomnia, heart arrythmias and palpitations, and fatigue. It has also been associated with a number of mental health problems, ranging from autism and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder to mood swings, depression and anxiety.
You might think that with so much evidence stacked up against it, regulators would protect the public from exposure to this dangerous technology. However, Clegg noted that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which is in charge of this important task, is actually composed of former telecommunications executives and engineers, representing a conflict of interest, while there are no doctors or scientists there.
Another problem is the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, which bars telecommunication firms from being sued over the health or safety of their products. He believes these companies have long been aware of the dangers, and that is why they have hundreds of lobbyists working on their behalf to protect the industry.
Moreover, the FCC’s guidelines are now more than 25 years old and have not been updated to account for the considerable advancements in technology that have been made recently.
“And in fact, the telecommunications industry is self-policing, so what we are left with is almost a Wild West scenario,” he added.
(more)
correct me if i'm wrong, but... 5G is just a protocol. The programming is different, but it relies on the same frequencies and power levels as 4G.
Until I see this disproven, it's pretty hard to understand any concerns about its health impacts.
I originally heard this here on GAW, and nobody was able to disprove it then. Let's see what you've got, everybody (I look forward to your downdoots)
I did a search on DDG and then Yandex. Here is the info from Yandex.
https://expose-news.com/2024/04/14/ten-new-studies-detail-health-risks-of-5g-analysis-by-dr-joseph-mercola/
https://techwellness.com/blogs/expertise/5g-dangers-your-guide-to-millimeter-wireless-and-smart-emf-effects-on-your-body