No, unless you believe the Q-team can look several years into the future. It was well established, that RR was Rod Rosenstein.
Delta proofs are mostly the time between Trump's tweets and Q's posts. On a few occasions a Q post was made days or weeks in advance, indicating some future planned event (like the trip to NK).
Believing that something happens DD/MM/2024 was predicted in a post e.g. DD/MM/2018, is IMO nonsense. I have not yet seen such a "proof". With 4600 Q posts, it is not unlikely to find some match. The "matches" I have seen here were very reaching, in that it was interpreted out of the old post. It was confirmation bias in play.
Sorry for my rant, but I don't believe in fairy tales, and I think we as a group should adhere to sober research, where Q laid the foundation of our knowledge today. If we start splurging on about time travel or that Q had planned this in detail 5 years in advance, we just confirm mainstream media and normies belief, that we are loonies.
Initially thought that also but when this guy came into perspective I had seen one of our frens theorize this as a double meaning. The timing of the delta and context of the drop might fit both.
u/#q2212
[RR] Ryan Routh?
https://www.newsweek.com/ryan-routh-donald-trump-assassination-attempt-hearing-1957914
u/#pratt
INTRIGUING thought!!!
RR is Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General under Trump for a while.
https://qalerts.app/keys/
Link courtesy of u/7Nick9/
"Double meanings exist."
No, unless you believe the Q-team can look several years into the future. It was well established, that RR was Rod Rosenstein.
Delta proofs are mostly the time between Trump's tweets and Q's posts. On a few occasions a Q post was made days or weeks in advance, indicating some future planned event (like the trip to NK).
Believing that something happens DD/MM/2024 was predicted in a post e.g. DD/MM/2018, is IMO nonsense. I have not yet seen such a "proof". With 4600 Q posts, it is not unlikely to find some match. The "matches" I have seen here were very reaching, in that it was interpreted out of the old post. It was confirmation bias in play.
Sorry for my rant, but I don't believe in fairy tales, and I think we as a group should adhere to sober research, where Q laid the foundation of our knowledge today. If we start splurging on about time travel or that Q had planned this in detail 5 years in advance, we just confirm mainstream media and normies belief, that we are loonies.
Initially thought that also but when this guy came into perspective I had seen one of our frens theorize this as a double meaning. The timing of the delta and context of the drop might fit both.