Do you remember when Q made numerous Biblical references and specifically mentioned to follow the bloodlines? The reason these are "Biblical Times" is because we are in the midst of an irregular, spiritual, psychological, information based, bloodline war where God wins in the end. The bloodlines engaged in this warfare are the interbred and intermarried fake Jewish Khazarian Mafia (Illuminati/Jesuit) bloodlines whom seek to exterminate the remaining Druze ethnic bloodlines (800,000 to 2,000,000 people) from Earth as they share the same scientifically proven DNA as Jesus Christ.
Speaking of Biblical times, this brings our attention to the intentionally lost book of Q (the Gospel of Q) which are the direct teachings of Jesus Christ believed to be one of the original gospels. The book Q consists of 6236 verses (6 + 2 + 3 + 6) = 17. This is very similar to the intentional exclusion of the Book of Enoch or the Gospel of Mary Magdalene from the Bible and the removal and reinstallation of the book of Revelation. The reason the Q gospel and many other books with hidden teachings were intentionally removed from the Bible is due to the constant Freemasonic Illuminati Jesuit (Vatican) editing, mistranslating, and restructuring of the Bible. This is to hide specific spiritual teachings relating to ascension, karmic debt, natural cures/remedies, reincarnation, the third eye (pineal gland), vibrational frequency, etc. where the Bible was censored from 777 (angel number) original books all the way down to 66 books (their favorite Luciferian number of course). Many people hid these sacred spiritual books to preserve for future generations since they were forbidden from the modern 1611 Edition King James Freemason Bible.
Really?! I just wiki’d it. Come on. 2nd Council of Nicaea. AD 787. The 1st Council was before that. Effort Anon, effort. 😉 Plenty of scholarly articles besides Wikipedia on both Councils.
I'm asking for a source on what alterations took place during the councils. As far as I can see, the first council had to do with Arianism and the second council had to do with Icons. I don't see anything at all regarding the canon of scripture in either of those councils.
Maybe you misspoke?
https://ps.edu/council-nicaea-biblical-canon/
https://textandcanon.org/the-council-of-nicea-and-the-biblical-canon/
If you can, please go to the documents of either council and show where either of them discussed the cannon of Scripture.
Maybe you meant the Council of Hippo? Are you sure you understand why they don't include the Book of Enoch?
The 1st & 2nd Council of Nicaea was very responsible for the books removed from the Bible becoming the Apocryphal books. They also heavily edited the Bible from scriptures possibly and most likely due to linguistic translations from Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Ge’ez, and even the mirrored stories out of the Sumerian Tablets. Billy Carson if 4Bidden Knowledge has an entire research book series and YouTube video series on these. The Dead Sea Scrolls also confirm the 2 most popular versions of the Bible (KJV and NIV), do not have all of the original books and in their original 100% written meanings And again this is due to linguistics and the agenda of man. Not because God or Christ intended these people to change the meanings of words or even remove entire books all for narrative control. Below is also a great video on linguistic changes and how the current/modern Bibles in certain places, especially around creation do not mean exactly what was originally written. Especially the idea of God being of 1. Turns out the original word Elohim is plural, not mono. Which in turn creates an entire different original narrative on God vs Gods. Is it what we choose, yes. But the context in current Bibles is per research, no longer modernly correct since we now have translated access to more complete and older, non-Vatican-controlled scriptural information.
It just may appear due to the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ge’ez Bible, that the Sumerians have been partially right/correct all along about some of the story of Human Creation. And this was all purposely hidden by the Roman Church/Vatican the last 1800+ years, so they alone could control the Christian religious narrative.
https://youtu.be/Qo7e2Rh6WpM?si=HjYZ_fbCQ26NisjA
I'm sorry friend, you don't know what you're talking about. Spiritual delusion.
You've yet to produce a single shred of evidence even though the documents pertaining to the councils are available for everyone. I read the 1st and 2nd councils of Nicea and they don't discuss the canon of scripture at all. Just a single line of text from either council where they determine the canon of Scripture will suffice, but you can't and won't produce it because it's impossible.
The council of Hippo is where Scripture is canonized. Have you ever read the councils yourself or have you solely relied on someone to interpret them for you?
The reason they don't include Enoch is because it wasn't written by the Patriarch Enoch, which would have dated it to be thousands of years old, it was written AFTER Isaiah, because it references Isaiah ergo not divinely inspired.
The Septuagint is the correct Old Testament, as that is the Old Testament referenced by Christ and the Apostles. The Dead Sea Scrolls are useful insofar as they prove the Masoretic text, which all Protestants use, to be incorrect.
The Roman Church doesn't have a monopoly on the truth of Christianity. The modern Roman Church didn't exist until 1051.
You do understand why Elohim is plural.. right? Trinity. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
But you're wise enough to debunk the Bible, right?
Romans 1:22
Good luck and take care. I'd highly recommend you to reassess the information that led you to your position and steel man, not straw man, Holy Scripture and the Church.
I like how you want to disprove but linked nothing. So your words are just here-say right now, just as you accused me, hypocrite. 😂😂
Disprove the Ge’ez Bible being the oldest Complete Bible on Earth. 800 years older than any other Bible. Only the Dead Sea Scrolls themselves come close. Constantine formulated the Bible to be put together and the 2 Council’s of Nicaea removed the apocryphal texts and edited the Bible. The Council of Hippo also edited as they saw fit for canon. That means editing and removing son!
You originally asked me who edited the Bible? You helped me prove your first question. That sure as sh1t it was edited away from thee original scriptures as INTENDED by God himself by man. Thank you for helping me prove I was correct in that.
Now you clearly failed to recognize how old the Book of Enoch is. Why is it found in both the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Ge’ez Bible if it is not original canon. And the people that decided it wasn’t original canon did so after AD 700?! When before it was F-ing included in the oldest Bibles known, besides what the Vatican currently hides?
Yeah you go figure that out genius. I’ll wait here for your next dance around the Awakening Truth of what is original and what isn’t. 😉 I suppose the Sumerian texts are also not true because you and some other 7th century man controlled council said so.
But the real point in any of this which you helped me prove I was correct again, was both biblical books and scriptures were factually edited and altered from their original context and scripture as they were originally written. And all due to linguistic changes and for power, religious narrative control! And God nor Christ EVER Intended for man to fall so low as to edit His Words.
So again thank you for assisting me in proving my original point back to you Anon. Let’s play again sometime. 😁