Do you remember when Q made numerous Biblical references and specifically mentioned to follow the bloodlines? The reason these are "Biblical Times" is because we are in the midst of an irregular, spiritual, psychological, information based, bloodline war where God wins in the end. The bloodlines engaged in this warfare are the interbred and intermarried fake Jewish Khazarian Mafia (Illuminati/Jesuit) bloodlines whom seek to exterminate the remaining Druze ethnic bloodlines (800,000 to 2,000,000 people) from Earth as they share the same scientifically proven DNA as Jesus Christ.
Speaking of Biblical times, this brings our attention to the intentionally lost book of Q (the Gospel of Q) which are the direct teachings of Jesus Christ believed to be one of the original gospels. The book Q consists of 6236 verses (6 + 2 + 3 + 6) = 17. This is very similar to the intentional exclusion of the Book of Enoch or the Gospel of Mary Magdalene from the Bible and the removal and reinstallation of the book of Revelation. The reason the Q gospel and many other books with hidden teachings were intentionally removed from the Bible is due to the constant Freemasonic Illuminati Jesuit (Vatican) editing, mistranslating, and restructuring of the Bible. This is to hide specific spiritual teachings relating to ascension, karmic debt, natural cures/remedies, reincarnation, the third eye (pineal gland), vibrational frequency, etc. where the Bible was censored from 777 (angel number) original books all the way down to 66 books (their favorite Luciferian number of course). Many people hid these sacred spiritual books to preserve for future generations since they were forbidden from the modern 1611 Edition King James Freemason Bible.
So what Bible version do you suggest?
I was always told King James, but I would like something easier to read but also accurate.
Any opinions?
Cant really recommend any single one. Have KJV, NRSV, LSV, New English Septuagint, Enoch 1 (RH Charles) and an Ethiopian. I read the NRSV (with Apocrypha) the most and check back to KJV, LSV, or Septuagint if anything might be confusing. And sometimes its still confusing.
Avoid New King James. KJV is fine and a septuagint.
I saw a video where a guy explained if God preserved His word in one source, it would be ez to corrupt that one source. But if He preserves it accross multiple sources, it is preserved. Downside is we have to compare and contrast multiple sources.
Literal Standard Version is pretty nice and doesnt shy away from "weird" translations.
Day 5 God created: Great dragons LSV Seamonsters NRSV Whales KJV
Basically is one hebrew word that can be translated as several different big creatures.
But every bible old testament is translated from masoretic text. Jews (that reject Jesus) recopied original hebrew to masorectic hebrew about 800-1000 AD and original hebrew scrolls are gone.
Septuagint (old hebrew to greek) actually predates masoretic. So i have started reading in the septuagint more recently.
Can also search a bible verse online and add the word "lexicon" and look at all the possible ways a word can be translated. Its way more varied than you would expect. Old languages didnt have large vocabularies as words tend to get added over time and become more specific.
Thank you for this. Very educated on the Bible, as I am not. Just trying to get more into the word.
God bless u
I just read alot. Watch alot of youtube duscussions. I thinks its good to look at several translations. And try to understand. And are still some sections i dont lol
And just got a tyndale bible 1973 print. That my mom had. So gonna be reading in it alot now. Idk know anything about it yet tho.