Do you remember when Q made numerous Biblical references and specifically mentioned to follow the bloodlines? The reason these are "Biblical Times" is because we are in the midst of an irregular, spiritual, psychological, information based, bloodline war where God wins in the end. The bloodlines engaged in this warfare are the interbred and intermarried fake Jewish Khazarian Mafia (Illuminati/Jesuit) bloodlines whom seek to exterminate the remaining Druze ethnic bloodlines (800,000 to 2,000,000 people) from Earth as they share the same scientifically proven DNA as Jesus Christ.
Speaking of Biblical times, this brings our attention to the intentionally lost book of Q (the Gospel of Q) which are the direct teachings of Jesus Christ believed to be one of the original gospels. The book Q consists of 6236 verses (6 + 2 + 3 + 6) = 17. This is very similar to the intentional exclusion of the Book of Enoch or the Gospel of Mary Magdalene from the Bible and the removal and reinstallation of the book of Revelation. The reason the Q gospel and many other books with hidden teachings were intentionally removed from the Bible is due to the constant Freemasonic Illuminati Jesuit (Vatican) editing, mistranslating, and restructuring of the Bible. This is to hide specific spiritual teachings relating to ascension, karmic debt, natural cures/remedies, reincarnation, the third eye (pineal gland), vibrational frequency, etc. where the Bible was censored from 777 (angel number) original books all the way down to 66 books (their favorite Luciferian number of course). Many people hid these sacred spiritual books to preserve for future generations since they were forbidden from the modern 1611 Edition King James Freemason Bible.
Not on drugs. Everything you’re attempting to lay out is debatable. Why? Because the info varies from scholar to scholar. And don’t start verbally attacking me like a Liberatard. We are better than that Anon. Let’s keep this civil please. I have not verbally assaulted you, I am just debating and disagreeing with you. That’s what debate is.
I see you finally laid out a source. Good. That means you did some research on your own instead of blindly asking again. That’s what I was hoping. Now your sources still don’t disprove what I said. It actually says nothing about the other apocryphal or non-canon texts at all. It just lays out who they were and where they were referenced by the church/s. So there is that.
Nor did you disprove the Bible or prior scriptures were not linguistically edited over time or had BOOKS REMOVED! I linked a full 4-hour video on the Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, and Latin linguistics and editing of the KJV leading to the NIV of Church’s Council’s and Pope’s in control of what would become The Vatican. And you have yet to disprove me, since the whole scholarly world knows It Was Clearly Done!
And how is it that Enoch is in all of the oldest Bibles, and Christ himself references Enoch? How does Enoch appear in the Sumerian Kings List/Text as a scribe? Why is Enoch listed as Noah’s great grandfather?
Please attempt to disprove how Enoch is not a true book of the Bible when it originally was per thee oldest Non-Church/Council controlled or edited scriptures of the Ge’ez Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls?!
https://www.bibleblender.com/2011/bible-stories/old-testament/genesis/from-adam-to-noah-genealogy-genesis-5-1-5-32
https://lovinglantern.com/jesus-quotes-book-enoch.html#Lessons_and_insights_from_the_Book_of_Enoch
https://cautivoestrella.org/en/jesus-quotes-book-of-enoch/
I commend you for trying Anon. But the Church certainly did more damage than you think to the Bible’s Originally Intended Format. Or else you and I, nor millions of other scholars would be having identical debates in their Awakening over ancient religious texts and beliefs. WWG1WGA