You're missing the boat. Of course no one believes fake ass franken foods in the public food supply is a good idea, who disputes that? Keep in mind that Tucker, who always seems to time things just right, brought the Means siblings on just around the tipping point where public awareness was already coming around about seed oils and processed crap. So obviously it was gamed out that their impact, social media, and politically connected boosts would be maximized.
So you NEED to ask questions when you suddenly have these Technocracy linked folks like the Means siblings now basically steering MAHA. Combine that with how the alternative wellness space has taken MAGA by storm over the past 1-2 years. Their packaging of health freedom as THE alternative to the Covid tyranny. Not only is that movement full of profit-centric shills (many of whom don't know what the hell they are doing with pushing supplements and survival packets), they are also shaping a new acceptable paradigm: "healthy" notions of data tracking.
The soft introduction to this comes in applications reasonable to people looking for answers, like preventative measures. So for example, sister Means is hawking continuous data collection/monitoring:
https://join.levelshealth.com/casey/?campaignId=36303
Along with her brother's CFR connections and association with health tech, its not too difficult to see where this particular vision of "personalized" healthcare is going. It will be the intersection of A.I. + biometrics + genomics etc. Packaging Technocracy for the Right. The "health freedom" movement is a necessary vehicle for vested interests who need our bio information for their data collecting, computational based social projects.
As soon as all these influencers and politicians start trying to convince you that government, once well meaning bureaucrats and appointees are in power, can provide answers to these longstanding healthcare crises we all suffer from, that is inevitably another step in reducing the self-sovereignty of the individual. Just because we agree to go along with these new programs instead of having them mandated doesn't make them any less controlling.
You're missing the boat. Of course no one believes fake ass franken foods in the public food supply is a good idea, who disputes that? Keep in mind that Tucker, who always seems to time things just right, brought the Means siblings on just around the tipping point where public awareness was already coming around about seed oils and processed crap. So obviously it was gamed out that their impact, social media, and politically connected boosts would be maximized.
So you NEED to ask questions when you suddenly have these Technocracy linked folks like the Means siblings now basically steering MAHA. Combine that with how the alternative wellness space has taken MAGA by storm over the past 1-2 years. Their packaging of health freedom as THE alternative to the Covid tyranny. Not only is that movement full of profit-centric shills (many of whom don't know what the hell they are doing with pushing supplements and survival packets), they are also shaping a new acceptable paradigm: "healthy" notions of data tracking.
The soft introduction to this comes in applications reasonable to people looking for answers, like preventative measures. So for example, sister Means is hawking continuous data collection/monitoring: https://join.levelshealth.com/casey/?campaignId=36303
Along with her brother's CFR connections and association with health tech, its not too difficult to see where this particular vision of "personalized" healthcare is going. It will be the intersection of A.I. + biometrics + genomics etc. Packaging Technocracy for the Right. The "health freedom" movement is a necessary vehicle for vested interests who need our bio information for their data collecting, computational based social projects.
As soon as all these influencers and politicians start trying to convince you that government, once well meaning bureaucrats and appointees are in power, can provide answers to these longstanding healthcare crises we all suffer from, that is inevitably another step in reducing the self-sovereignty of the individual. Just because we agree to go along with these new programs instead of having them mandated doesn't make them any less controlling.