Auberon Herbert's writings are a good introduction to Voluntaryism, which is exactly what it sounds like:
As Eric Mack writes, “Carrying natural rights theory to its logical limits, Herbert demanded complete social and economic freedom for all noncoercive individuals and the radical restriction of the use of force to the role of protecting those freedoms―including the freedom of peaceful persons to withhold support from any or all state activities.” (from the Amazon description of the book linked below)
People believe (mistakenly, because of purposeful fuckery) that if we didn't have the type of system of law that we have, there would be "lawlessness," "anarchy," and "chaos." Nothing could be further from the truth
I agree wholeheartedly, and in fact I doubt there is very much that we DO disagree on.
Auberon Herbert's writings are a good introduction to Voluntaryism, which is exactly what it sounds like:
The Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State, and Other Essays
Back to your comment:
I agree wholeheartedly, and in fact I doubt there is very much that we DO disagree on.