Someone effectively owns or rules over them, and all righteous government authority is delegated.. so..
Doesn’t mean I’m right. Maybe they fall under delegated constitution authority with no direct oversight by the people other than electing righteous judges, and funding and asset ownership falling under congress or the state governor?
As noted I was only thinking through options, not presenting research or knowledge, but I should have remembered that Colorado appointed its judges. Derped on remembering it of course, but was reading about how this guy was appointed by Colorado’s democrat governor, and had already thought how this meant both of them have a conflict of interest stake in protecting the voting system against inspection, then totally forgot I’d ever looked that up.
“Tina and us”
I don’t know how, but if the courts are ours, there’s surely a way to bring about a correction in judgment within them.
I don’t know if or how it could be done, but it seems like it should be doable.
Interesting. They’re not?
Whose are they?
Someone effectively owns or rules over them, and all righteous government authority is delegated.. so..
Doesn’t mean I’m right. Maybe they fall under delegated constitution authority with no direct oversight by the people other than electing righteous judges, and funding and asset ownership falling under congress or the state governor?
I haven’t looked this up, just hypothecating.
Good info!
As noted I was only thinking through options, not presenting research or knowledge, but I should have remembered that Colorado appointed its judges. Derped on remembering it of course, but was reading about how this guy was appointed by Colorado’s democrat governor, and had already thought how this meant both of them have a conflict of interest stake in protecting the voting system against inspection, then totally forgot I’d ever looked that up.
Still trying to learn how the court systems work.