So, as many of you may know, I'm on board the "there will be no election" boat. And I have have been for a long time, because that's what all the Q drops point to, imo.
I think I'm correct on that, but my overview has suddenly changed.
After President Trump implored us to vote early and make it too big to rig, the dovetailing of the Q drops and Trump's innuendos are too much to ignore.
The election will be shut down on election Day, but not by the bad actors. It'll be shutdown by the W hats to prevent the steal. There will be no midnight drops of mysterious ballots because it'll be offline.
All your vote are belong to us.
Following Trump's advice, he will be so far in the lead at shutdown, they won't be able to steal it with their theft mechanism inoperable.
Think about this: 10 days darkness. Shutdown. {Please save the darnkess argument>going off memory post 88 clearly says darkness}
And the tweet of all tweets as they try and steal it through delays, motions to vacate, motions to default to a run off election and all kinds of shenanigans that are clearly illegal.... It all makes sense viewed through that prism.
It shines a light on Trump's dominant win, the way they will scurry about trying to prevent his win. The riots that will ensue. And the military quashing it.
And the tweet.
It all, and I mean all, fits perfectly.
I had made a longer post about this, but the section of 4D chess we are at is called "Lets get ourselves a WW3".
The Zionists want a WW3, which can only happen if US attacks Iran directly. Much as they try, that wont happen with Biden/Harris since the Obama faction is so deeply embedded with the Islamists.
Trump has been pushing the "right" rhetoric regarding this. I had created a timeline of each Trump assassination attempt, his rhetoric against Iran and Israel escalating right after that.
But even the Zionists know that if they allow Trump to become president outright, he wont go along with the plan. So the game being played right now is kinda like a hostage situation. Like all good hostage situations, there is no perfect "swap" that works for both sides.
Make Trump president first? He wont bomb Iran.
Force Trump to bomb Iran first? How the heck is that even possible?
I think what happens is that the election will happen. Then its gonna be all kind of challenges to certification. While this is chugging along slowly, the 2020 voter fraud will start getting publicly exposed.
It gets to the point where the 2024 certification will be paused (ostensibly, to avoid the 2020 repeat - atleast thats the excuse they will use), BUT, the 2020 fraud will make people more and more angry, so that momentum will build to call Trump the legitimate president until 2024 election is sorted.
Now the hostage swap conundrum is solved.
Trump can start an Iran way before he is inaugurated as president, because "he is already the president"
How will this resolve? Dont forget the 3rd party stuck between these moves - the Obama/Harris/Biden puppet party. They will probably precipitate the stuff they have better control of - Financial Collapse.
Maybe the whole thing will end with Sum of All fears theme - Trump refusing to bomb Iran, so an "Iranian nuke" shows up on mainland. But only, its not "Iranian" at all, but more like NONAMEian - segwaying back to where it all started 8 years ago - Uranium One.
Let Israel solve the Iranian problem with a very big boom boom. Drop a few of those on the houses of the most radical Islamic clerics who foment hatred against the West and 80% of the Iranian problem is solved! Why should Trump get his hands dirty when Israel is champing at the bit to drop glow in the dark bombs? Leave the average Iranian alone, just take out the mullahs and the Republican Guard.
Because it's not enough to solve the Iranian problem, but we also need to solve the Israel problem
Why not solve the most pressing problem first, Iran. Then after that has gone away we come up with a clear vision on how to take care of Israel.
Then you don't understand how the Hegelian Dialectic works.
Hint: both side are the same and you can't take one side or without taking the other side out