Megan McCain Blasts Kamala Harris For Sharing Questionable Story Relating To Her Father, Late Sen. John McCain
(pjmedia.com)
Embarrassing!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Reading it more carefully exposes the fissure lines within the Cabal.
We all know that RINOs have been coming out in droves to endorse Kamala, and yet Meghan NONAME has a problem with Kamala claiming that NONAME said:
What gives? Why does this mini-satanist who hates Trump badly, have an issue with her dad saying Kamala would make a great Senator?
The key clue comes later down in the article:
This is the fissure line along which Cabal is collapsing right now. Just think about it - far more important than stopping Trump, for these RINOs, is supporting Zionists.
Gives us more insight into the reality that Trump is playing the Zionists and the Dem's against each other, even as they desperately wanna hug each other in the mutual embrace of Trump hate.
A 40 year old woman used that term? My goodness.
Hey Megan--who killed Don Bolles?
That doesn't surprise me. Personally, I think it goes further than that, in that they want to maintain their empire building at all cost, as they continue to run their trafficking rings and other money diverting actions all over the world. I recall a Downsize DC campaign related to this called : Stop Funding Dependent Dictators. Every chance I had, I'd make an opportunity to sign that campaign.
I also recall Ron Paul citing several different reports saying foreign aid to countries like Israel actually hurt the countries more than leaving them to fight their own battles, and that the state department would try to dictate who Israel could and could not negotiate peace with. So I actually trust my own government less than I'd trust most governments - Including Israel's. (this is not to say Israel's government is to be trusted - but we set up all the dynamics in the Middle East: https://zeroaggressionproject.org/perry-willis/did-u-s-politicians-support-the-more-evil-side-in-world-war-one/
A valid point is also made in Joan Peter's From Time Immemorial, that Great Britain told both sides that they could have the same land, then broke faith with the new states time after time, and more promises were broken to Israel than to any of the other nations!
(one could legitimately argue that Hitler was Woodrow Wilson's love child - and there's a whole air craft carrier's worth of information from Perry Willis on this one - One more reason to see him as one of the worst presidents, if not the worst,)
https://zeroaggressionproject.org/perry-willis/was-adolf-hitler-woodrow-wilsons-love-child/
https://zeroaggressionproject.org/perry-willis/did-u-s-policies-foster-the-rise-of-radical-islam/
https://zeroaggressionproject.org/perry-willis/was-world-war-two-a-good-war/
Very interesting article series, gonna watch the whole set, but here are my thoughts on the question "Was WW2 a good war?"
I will start off saying, all in all, if a "good war" implies defeating the plans of the enemies of humanity - then WW2 was a pretty good war.
It did throw a huge wrench into the plans of the Satanists, whose goal with WW2 was the full defeat of Europe with the Hegelian Dialectic that is Fascism vs Communism. Either Stalin or Hitler were meant to destroy most of Europe and rule over what was remaining with an iron fist.
Instead, it turns out both Hitler and Stalin were far more redpilled than they were given credit and between the two of them, they defeated both the Nazis and the Commies.
They denied the Satanists (for the SECOND time), a "united Europe" under one globalist control. (First time was in 1812 when Russia defeated Napoleon).
It set back their plans by some 7 decades and at the same time, ended up creating the most redpill that woke up millions of people eventually, one way or another.
As for defeating "Japanese Empire" - that was total BS. Japanese Empire has always been a proxy for Anglo-American empire since the 1860s, and WW2 did not defeat this proxy. Infact, it made the proxy even more stronger and more deeply embedded within the empire. But at the same time, it also created a powerful anti-globalist resistance sub-culture within the psyche of the Japanese people, even if most of them don't even realise this.