Very interesting article series, gonna watch the whole set, but here are my thoughts on the question "Was WW2 a good war?"

I will start off saying, all in all, if a "good war" implies defeating the plans of the enemies of humanity - then WW2 was a pretty good war.

It did throw a huge wrench into the plans of the Satanists, whose goal with WW2 was the full defeat of Europe with the Hegelian Dialectic that is Fascism vs Communism. Either Stalin or Hitler were meant to destroy most of Europe and rule over what was remaining with an iron fist.

Instead, it turns out both Hitler and Stalin were far more redpilled than they were given credit and between the two of them, they defeated both the Nazis and the Commies.

They denied the Satanists (for the SECOND time), a "united Europe" under one globalist control. (First time was in 1812 when Russia defeated Napoleon).

It set back their plans by some 7 decades and at the same time, ended up creating the most redpill that woke up millions of people eventually, one way or another.

As for defeating "Japanese Empire" - that was total BS. Japanese Empire has always been a proxy for Anglo-American empire since the 1860s, and WW2 did not defeat this proxy. Infact, it made the proxy even more stronger and more deeply embedded within the empire. But at the same time, it also created a powerful anti-globalist resistance sub-culture within the psyche of the Japanese people, even if most of them don't even realise this.