Yeah i can’t get on board with this yet. These are some pretty out there claims with minimal supporting evidence. There are far better techniques than optical microscopes for finding out what she’s claiming.
I am 43 career year scientist (biochemist) speaking here:
The fact is the evidence shows that you don't need rocket science to detect these kinds of things.
The science doesn't have to be difficult to be right, or to be credible.
There are plenty of "experts" with egos who will try to make things more difficult than they really are, just to puff themselves - too many are on the publish or perish treadmill, and rather than studying science and publishing from a position of objectivity, their narrative copy and conclusions are bought as sponsored.
A more difficult explanation doen't translate to more thoughtful explantion, when thought contortion is at the heart of the mental exercise made under a pretense of accomplishment.
Yeah i can’t get on board with this yet. These are some pretty out there claims with minimal supporting evidence. There are far better techniques than optical microscopes for finding out what she’s claiming.
I am 43 career year scientist (biochemist) speaking here:
The fact is the evidence shows that you don't need rocket science to detect these kinds of things.
The science doesn't have to be difficult to be right, or to be credible.
There are plenty of "experts" with egos who will try to make things more difficult than they really are, just to puff themselves - too many are on the publish or perish treadmill, and rather than studying science and publishing from a position of objectivity, their narrative copy and conclusions are bought as sponsored.
A more difficult explanation doen't translate to more thoughtful explantion, when thought contortion is at the heart of the mental exercise made under a pretense of accomplishment.
Excellent reply...