It’s possible that it’s espionage and not sedition. Both seem plausible. As to which would be more likely to hold up in court… ?
Election interference is probably a hard charge to get to stick on a foreign national without an extradition agreement, which might be going away with maritime law. I don’t know where that law’s legal basis comes from.
It’s possible that it’s espionage and not sedition. Both seem plausible. As to which would be more likely to hold up in court… ?
Election interference is probably a hard charge to get to stick on a foreign national without an extradition agreement, which might be going away with maritime law. I don’t know where that law’s legal basis comes from.
They would be saboteurs. Trying to sabotage our election.