Deep ass cover? or DS disinfo and character assassination?

I find it conceivable that DJT and the Team behind him (i.e. Military intel and/or "the White Hats") would allow a totally corrupt pedophile to be first in line to control and direct the executive government should anything happen to Donald Trump. It makes zero sense, in that it's an unreasonable concept if one gives any credence to the idea that the Q operation is legit (what it purports to be) and that DJT had support and backing in a plan to take down the DS that preceded his announcing his candidacy in 2015.

"He was forced to choose the corrupt Pence by the party, otherwise he could not have run" - this assertion would make sense if we were talking about Bush, Clinton, or anyone else who is a part of the Swamp, as for them, it is all about power and advancing their selfish aims. Would DJT & WH compromise himself THAT much? Compromise the entire potential of the plan by putting a corrupted pedo in the No. 2 spot?

"He did not know who Pence was" - again, incompatible with the idea that DJT ran based on a plan that was supported by Mil intel and other very powerful movers who had been planning to destroy the DS and free America.

Another point: Political Satanist methodology: accuse your enemy of what you yourself are doing. It makes sense and is quite reasonable to theorize that the DS and Cabal would want to destroy Pence's reputation, sow doubt and disbelief among MAGA and Trump supporters. Accusing Pence of being a pedo would work perfectly, as he was publicly known as a very devout religious man (Christian), and there have been plenty of examples (that evil takes absolute relish in) of outwardly very upright religious people being actually profoundly corrupt. The accusations against Pence play directly into that narrative structure. I.e. they become believable to certain people who have a certain bias, even if it is a small or dormant one.

That said, I haven't personally investigated the accusations against Pence of him being a secret child abusing pedophile. Primarily because the entire story being sold seems just so unreasonable when In consider ALL the other actual facts around Pence and Trump (although some of those 'facts' are things that I believe about the Q operation, about the Plan and about Donald Trump and what is happening.

So, do I give credence to and attach to theories (assertions) about Pence that are negative or to theories about pence, inducing actual facts, that align with what I believe about DJT, the Q op, the White Hats and everything that has been going on the last 8+ years?

Another point for me: who attaches to the pedo Pence narratives and how they attach to them, I consider this also. For my part, I've observed a lot of (what I believe to be) disinfo operations, fake maga and disrupters working in the 5G warfare of the past 8 years. They have a certain vibration, behavior, they affect people in certain ways and appeal to certain psychological profiles. The anti-Pence stuff resonates with what (I think) I know about those operations and disinfo narratives. Now, that may be confirmation bias on my part, but overall, it makes sense to me, and I use that sense a lot these days as a compass, a sense built up over the past 8 years infused with ways of thinking about truth, lies, and 5G warfare (including psychological warfare).

Do I KNOW that Pence is not a pedo? No. But I've very comfortable and confident in my conclusion that he isn't. DJT's attitude towards him is probably the biggest proof there is that Pence is/was not what those narratives make him out to be.