There are so many jobs that at just useless BS. I remember that idiot chick at the head of the EPA during the Flint Michigan lead in the water, hearings. All she admitted to was shuffling paper for months! An independent professional found the problem, but it wasn't their professional so they had to send it to another department who sent it to another department. That went on for months!!! It was only when Trump got in, that money got sent to fix it.
There are some major problems with this story and the way it's being presented.
Condemning a building is not the same as property confiscation or forced buyout. Local governments have the authority to enforce building codes and declare a building unlivable in its current condition.
From the debris piles and mud on the walls it's clear the whole area was under 4-5 feet of water. That house is probably full of mud and will need to be gutted to prevent deadly mold infestation. Local government had the responsibility to condemn it. This x account suggests MSHA was involved but the witness does not mention that, nor does she say the land was taken.
The trailers are mobile homes, likely rented out by the person in the brick house. They also need be gutted after being underwater. According the witness several of them were not condemned because they had little water damage. Those tenants were allowed to stay, which is further confirmation that the land was not taken.
Important to note that whoever condemned these buildings relied on local firefighters to enforce it. This x accounts wants us to think FEMA thugs wearing mining hats were physically throwing people off the property. My question is, who actually condemned the buildings? NC governor is a DS stooge so it wouldn't surprise me if local authorities were going along with whatever FEMA suggested.
The inside of that home looks like a standard flood damage tear out.
People sometimes confuse Red DCert tags with a building being condemned but it is not actually the same thing. I didn’t notice any DCert tags or Condemnation Notices on the doors, which ARE required for EVERY entryway into a building that has been inspected by the state after a disaster (so people don’t enter unsafe buildings unaware of the danger). Haven’t worked with fema though so I’m not sure of their process or what tags or marking they use, but all I noticed was a “No Smoking” sign.
Watch the Bear link from Grindstone ministries. He hints at contamination of soil and water prompting condemnation of properties. Birth defects etc. very good watch. Posted 2 hours ago by One4Freedom
I pray that this is the end of FEMA! They are evil!
But they are needed to funnel money to the illegals.
I'm already praying for the end of fema, you don't need to sell it to me.
I want to see government down by 75%.
That little? I think Elon could do even better than that. We will soon know.
Dan Bongino said 80% should be removed. He was with Secret Services and FBI.
There are so many jobs that at just useless BS. I remember that idiot chick at the head of the EPA during the Flint Michigan lead in the water, hearings. All she admitted to was shuffling paper for months! An independent professional found the problem, but it wasn't their professional so they had to send it to another department who sent it to another department. That went on for months!!! It was only when Trump got in, that money got sent to fix it.
NC really shows them up. These 4 years told us how inept these people are.
…. and the possibility that the dam was purposefully opened under the cover of the manufactured weather
It is extremely sad.
There are some major problems with this story and the way it's being presented.
Condemning a building is not the same as property confiscation or forced buyout. Local governments have the authority to enforce building codes and declare a building unlivable in its current condition.
From the debris piles and mud on the walls it's clear the whole area was under 4-5 feet of water. That house is probably full of mud and will need to be gutted to prevent deadly mold infestation. Local government had the responsibility to condemn it. This x account suggests MSHA was involved but the witness does not mention that, nor does she say the land was taken.
The trailers are mobile homes, likely rented out by the person in the brick house. They also need be gutted after being underwater. According the witness several of them were not condemned because they had little water damage. Those tenants were allowed to stay, which is further confirmation that the land was not taken.
Important to note that whoever condemned these buildings relied on local firefighters to enforce it. This x accounts wants us to think FEMA thugs wearing mining hats were physically throwing people off the property. My question is, who actually condemned the buildings? NC governor is a DS stooge so it wouldn't surprise me if local authorities were going along with whatever FEMA suggested.
Thanks for the information.
The inside of that home looks like a standard flood damage tear out. People sometimes confuse Red DCert tags with a building being condemned but it is not actually the same thing. I didn’t notice any DCert tags or Condemnation Notices on the doors, which ARE required for EVERY entryway into a building that has been inspected by the state after a disaster (so people don’t enter unsafe buildings unaware of the danger). Haven’t worked with fema though so I’m not sure of their process or what tags or marking they use, but all I noticed was a “No Smoking” sign.
Thanks for the info. Appreciate.
but that is not happening...just ask them......
https://x.com/thinktankfranks/status/1847075039117496460
https://x.com/Breeauna9/status/1846439135046693189
Can they do that?
I don't know.
They're called mobile homes. They can be moved out and replaced.
Yes.
I guess Fema's been busy after all.
Yes, doing nefarious thing.
Watch the Bear link from Grindstone ministries. He hints at contamination of soil and water prompting condemnation of properties. Birth defects etc. very good watch. Posted 2 hours ago by One4Freedom
Thank you.