You can't "tear it apart" with facts. Because everything he states is opinion and manipulation. Consider the following nonsense:

Confirmed conspiracies typically involve small, isolated groups, like the top echelon of a company or a single terrorist cell. Even the alliance among tobacco companies to hide their products’ danger was confined to those at the top, who made decisions and enlisted paid scientists and ad agencies to spread their messages.

False conspiracies tend to implicate wide swaths of people, such as world leaders, mainstream media outlets, the global scientific community, the Hollywood entertainment industry and interconnected government agencies.

Note how he makes a blanket statement which is just a statistical prediction, and then uses it to discount the very real conspiracy of the globalist criminal syndicate. Yet I'm sure if you ask him if he believes that a mafia like group could control municipalities in the early 20th century, he'd agree. And then go right on to vehemently deny that those same control mechanisms could be used on a global scale.

You can't tear apart narratives that are designed to sound real to those only too willing to let someone else do their thinking and believe in psy-ence.

Don't waste your time with this one. This is what you get from the intellectual elite who are unwilling to consider their fundamental biases. He claims that it is "conspiracy theorists" who don't apply the scientific method, but then he does exactly the same thing by not applying the scientific method to the detritus that spews from his own mouth.