2
Anon80085 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is your goal?

I use fidelity for a self-directed Roth IRA.

If you want to invest, I'd go with a Roth IRA.

If you don't use a Roth IRA, any gains you make is considered income and will be taxed.

1
Anon80085 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they cashed it out, and I received cash. What's odds is I've held other stocks that went off, then came back later.

3
Anon80085 3 points ago +3 / -0

I saw a report of a possible 900% short.

4
Anon80085 4 points ago +4 / -0

That happens to all tickers that go bankrupt. BBBY turned into BBBYQ

1
Anon80085 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't disagree.

The only reason I don't trust him is because he's too perfect of a candidate.

He's saying ALL the right things.

0
Anon80085 0 points ago +2 / -2

He's an American citizen, and objectively better than 99% of candidates up to this point in history.

He says all the right things. If it wasn't for the WEF background he'd have my vote. (And obviously ifTrump wasn't running).

2
Anon80085 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did he tell his supporters to be peaceful and go home on J6? And apparently didn't listen??

Why would this be any different.

4
Anon80085 4 points ago +4 / -0

You could think of it that way, however the other side has been joking about the list since it's been in the news.

Reddit has being going hard on it, they're like see trumps on it, no biden!!

This delay could be a good thing, they already talked about it, and anything gained from that will be forgotten by the time the one we want comes out.

4
Anon80085 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh man, you guys really made me depressed. I got viral induced myocarditis when covid first spread. Although I "tested" negative for covid in the hospital, I know I had it.

I have young kids, and it breaks my hear to know I don't have long here.

I just want to watch my kids grow up, I love them so much.

6
Anon80085 6 points ago +6 / -0

You don't fight a 16 year plan over night. You fight it with your own 16 year plan. But in Trump fashion, they will have it done in half the time.

by BQnita
1
Anon80085 1 point ago +1 / -0

Certified knowledge of the constitution. I don't know why you'd assume a lawyer would have more weight. It's either you know the constitution or you don't. You're scenario would be a non issue in my scenario because I would have first gut congress and have a trusted open source AI replace the last system that is bound to the will of the people. I'll admit the weight system may be extreme, but that is my counter to mob rule.

by BQnita
1
Anon80085 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you assume I wouldn't get certified? And why would we allow cheating.

by BQnita
1
Anon80085 1 point ago +1 / -0

That wasn't a dog whistle for rassism.

What I'm talking about is achievable by anyone.

I'd place a high value on education. People who fulley understand the constitution should have a heavier vote.

Literally anyone can learn that.

by BQnita
2
Anon80085 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole point of sending one person to DC was back then that one person can carry everyone's word.

Now-a-days we have the internet and no issue of mass communication. Congress is a relic that needs to go. We can set up a new system where everyone's voices are heard. Having one person make the decision has too high of a chance of leading to corruption. I understand mob rule is a thing, but there are ways around that. I would give each person's vote an individual weight. Some people's vote should be worth more than anothers. For example if you receive government assistance, your vote is not worth a lot. I see AI being a big mover of this.

view more: Next ›