I dont even know how to describe this tweet. Imagine you take a bunch of beautiful roses and some hot pile of garbage and made a bouquet, that would look pretty cool until you smelt it. Yeah, thats the closest I can describe this tweet.
Everyone with half a brain has been blaming the British for far longer than the time they got first redpilled, because the stuff British did is so blatantly horrific
British "leadership" did not "team up" with Rothschilds to create debt based financial system in 1600. Mayer Amschel Rothschild wasn't even born until 1744 (sheese, can this guy do some basic research?)
What he is trying to say is that the Bankster Jews subverted the British Monarchy and used Britain as their vehicle for colonising the world long before the debt based "financial system" was created.
Napoleonic wars were funded by the Banksters, while the same Banksters under the guise of British ensnared the whole of Europe into debt. Napolean was the stick and British bankers loans were the carrots, both used by the Banksters.
This was only foiled by the Russians in 1812 when they defeated the Napoleon's army after he sacked Moscow.
Remember - in 1812 British defeated USA, and Napoleon defeated most of continental Europe except Russia. Russia was the only thing that stood between the Banksters and total global enslavement.
Napoleonic wars are the true First "World War" even though most people today dont even remember them. We came this close to defeat as Humanity.
If Napoleon had succeeded, the Banksters would have been able to use their Congress of Vienna to create the Europeon vassal state 150 years before they could create EU.
If Jewish Banksters are the fist that punched our face, British Monarchy was the glove around that fist. So tell me which is worse?
I dont even know how to describe this tweet. Imagine you take a bunch of beautiful roses and some hot pile of garbage and made a bouquet, that would look pretty cool until you smelt it. Yeah, thats the closest I can describe this tweet.
Everyone with half a brain has been blaming the British for far longer than the time they got first redpilled, because the stuff British did is so blatantly horrific
British "leadership" did not "team up" with Rothschilds to create debt based financial system in 1600. Mayer Amschel Rothschild wasn't even born until 1744 (sheese, can this guy do some basic research?)
What he is trying to say is that the Bankster Jews subverted the British Monarchy and used Britain as their vehicle for colonising the world long before the debt based "financial system" was created.
This was only foiled by the Russians in 1812 when they defeated the Napoleon's army after he sacked Moscow.
Remember - in 1812 British defeated USA, and Napoleon defeated most of continental Europe except Russia. Russia was the only thing that stood between the Banksters and total global enslavement.
Napoleonic wars are the true First "World War" even though most people today dont even remember them. We came this close to defeat as Humanity.
If Napoleon had succeeded, the Banksters would have been able to use their Congress of Vienna to create the Europeon vassal state 150 years before they could create EU.
If Jewish Banksters are the fist that punched our face, British Monarchy was the glove around that fist. So tell me which is worse?
That's what I keep saying for years - wwi is napoleon wars, and it's never stopped really, just keeps transforming