One thing is competition, of course. The illegals are cheaper, so presumably most of even those companies that would prefer to hire citizens for the grunt work can't afford to do that, or at least think they can't, because then they'd lose to those that do use the illegals.
Plus I presume you may have other systems in use, like maybe government subsidies, that help companies that hire "refugees" or such compete against firms that rely on only citizen employees. I know something like those exist in Finland.
I worked with a lot of companies (logistics and infrastructure) who didn't give a s!!t about the immigration status of illegals, all they saw was quarterly numbers in a spreadsheet...and the opportunity to buy another lakeside house, boat, or silicone-boobed trophy wife.
Corrupt business owners constantly get a pass in this larger problem, and when challenged they whine and whine about Muh Can't Afford To Follow The Law.
It's time someone made THEIR illegal activity costly.
Most of those can still deal with that. But there are ones who can't. The really small operations, the ones still left. Think in terms of something like a family farm, already squeezed almost out of existence due to the regulations and laws the big ones can deal with but they really can't, that might need extra workers a couple of times per year. Who are they going to hire? Or will they then just give up and sell to anybody willing to buy?
Who are the ones who can afford lobbyists? The rules favor them. And that is not going to change by getting rid of the illegals.
I worked for 20+ years with small farmers all over North America and elsewhere, in a variety of capacities (policy, analysis, research, networking/organizing, business development).
NONE of them saw hiring illegals as an option.
They wanted to see a playing field where they and their families could transmit traditions, land, skills, and farming systems between generations, without being hugely punished...
...by the big boys who after all had as their scheme to suck up every acre of farmland in the US, and consolidate it, and hire "farmers" to run it mainly as neofeudal sharecroppers.
Those small farmers--hundreds of thousands of them, then--HAD THE ANSWERS. But they were prevented from putting them into practice because those who controlled policy response, taxation, estate law, etc., had their own ideas of how things should be...and the power and money to inflict that model.
A big part of that money and power involves trafficking of illegal labor.
Plus let's not overlook how a lot of the big "farm" interests were doing backdoor deals with Chyna and others. E.g., in the late 1990s up till the 2008 crash, I took calls nearly every day regarding "orientals" arriving in big black SUVs and going into farm fields (both corporate and small farm) to steal germplasm.
Chyna stole trillions of dollars in germplasm that way, with the help of the big players, and the farmers who developed it through painstaking labor got nothing.
One thing is competition, of course. The illegals are cheaper, so presumably most of even those companies that would prefer to hire citizens for the grunt work can't afford to do that, or at least think they can't, because then they'd lose to those that do use the illegals.
Plus I presume you may have other systems in use, like maybe government subsidies, that help companies that hire "refugees" or such compete against firms that rely on only citizen employees. I know something like those exist in Finland.
I worked with a lot of companies (logistics and infrastructure) who didn't give a s!!t about the immigration status of illegals, all they saw was quarterly numbers in a spreadsheet...and the opportunity to buy another lakeside house, boat, or silicone-boobed trophy wife.
Corrupt business owners constantly get a pass in this larger problem, and when challenged they whine and whine about Muh Can't Afford To Follow The Law.
It's time someone made THEIR illegal activity costly.
Most of those can still deal with that. But there are ones who can't. The really small operations, the ones still left. Think in terms of something like a family farm, already squeezed almost out of existence due to the regulations and laws the big ones can deal with but they really can't, that might need extra workers a couple of times per year. Who are they going to hire? Or will they then just give up and sell to anybody willing to buy?
Who are the ones who can afford lobbyists? The rules favor them. And that is not going to change by getting rid of the illegals.
I worked for 20+ years with small farmers all over North America and elsewhere, in a variety of capacities (policy, analysis, research, networking/organizing, business development).
NONE of them saw hiring illegals as an option.
They wanted to see a playing field where they and their families could transmit traditions, land, skills, and farming systems between generations, without being hugely punished...
...by the big boys who after all had as their scheme to suck up every acre of farmland in the US, and consolidate it, and hire "farmers" to run it mainly as neofeudal sharecroppers.
Those small farmers--hundreds of thousands of them, then--HAD THE ANSWERS. But they were prevented from putting them into practice because those who controlled policy response, taxation, estate law, etc., had their own ideas of how things should be...and the power and money to inflict that model.
A big part of that money and power involves trafficking of illegal labor.
Plus let's not overlook how a lot of the big "farm" interests were doing backdoor deals with Chyna and others. E.g., in the late 1990s up till the 2008 crash, I took calls nearly every day regarding "orientals" arriving in big black SUVs and going into farm fields (both corporate and small farm) to steal germplasm.
Chyna stole trillions of dollars in germplasm that way, with the help of the big players, and the farmers who developed it through painstaking labor got nothing.