Q suggested that there has been technologies kept from civilization because they reduce the profits of established industries.
Q has implied that such technologies would be released to us.
I remember about 5 years ago, Trump said "you can't believe the technology that is about to get released."
We have always known that Elon musk is a genius, but it seems like lately the narrative is taking that to new extremes.
Trump is saying he is not from this world. A recent article stated how he put together a computer system in one month that would typically take 4 years.
Whether it is real, or a role he is playing, he is now essentially Tony Stark, a man that can create a super warrior armor out of a box of scraps inside a cave.
What better way to introduce amazing technology and to make it readily available to the public then a semi philanthropist super genius like Elon musk.
I can imagine in 5 years from now he says oh I just discovered a source for unlimited energy. 10 years from now, Oh, I just discovered anti-gravity.
It would not make much sense for this technology to be introduced by the government. Would you really want Exxon to be the ones that reveal they discovered a new energy source?
Your thoughts?
I've applied for a couple of patents and it seems the examiners are told to reject EVERY initial submission (at least from inventors not represented by an attorney), for ridiculous reasons which can easily be addressed on a follow-up submission, but it is just a major pain. The USPTO is probably making millions off this practice because most people won't bother re-submitting. I had one examiner reject a UTILITY patent because he said it was infringing on a DESIGN patent! (if you know anything about the process, that is ridiculous, which they counted on me not knowing, but I didn't bother resubmitting because I felt the invention likely would not make enough to justify all the effort)