Q suggested that there has been technologies kept from civilization because they reduce the profits of established industries.
Q has implied that such technologies would be released to us.
I remember about 5 years ago, Trump said "you can't believe the technology that is about to get released."
We have always known that Elon musk is a genius, but it seems like lately the narrative is taking that to new extremes.
Trump is saying he is not from this world. A recent article stated how he put together a computer system in one month that would typically take 4 years.
Whether it is real, or a role he is playing, he is now essentially Tony Stark, a man that can create a super warrior armor out of a box of scraps inside a cave.
What better way to introduce amazing technology and to make it readily available to the public then a semi philanthropist super genius like Elon musk.
I can imagine in 5 years from now he says oh I just discovered a source for unlimited energy. 10 years from now, Oh, I just discovered anti-gravity.
It would not make much sense for this technology to be introduced by the government. Would you really want Exxon to be the ones that reveal they discovered a new energy source?
Your thoughts?
Several years ago I read that unless an invention can make at least $50,000, it's not worth patenting, so it must be up to at least $100,000 now. Marketing the invention without a patent was recommended for a couple reasons. No matter how good a patent seems, someone can likely find a way to get around it (it only takes an "improvement" of an existing patent to get a new patent), and some company might outright infringe on the invention without worrying about it because a lawsuit would take years to be resolved, and a small fortune required, which the individual inventor wouldn't likely be able to afford.