What contingency plans are the deep state planning if a Trump landslide occurs in the election? - The Great Awakening

What contingency plans are the deep state planning if a Trump landslide occurs in the election? 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 62 days ago by purkiss80 62 days ago by purkiss80 +196 / -0

@MikeBenzCyber suggests that they may refuse to certify Trump as President by using the 14th Amendment and the House of Representatives to give the electors to Kamala claiming Trump is not fit to serve given January 6th after a crisis event occurs. This is a dangerous cornered animal. It's going to be very interesting to see what happens in the next couple of months.

"They "may" make the argument that Donald Trump is disqualified under the 14th amendment because of January 6th... There is too much on the line for them. The fog of war is too thick. I think that this is the most important election in US history... I think if it was a fair fight he would win in a landslide but the fight is not fair but just how unfair it is, is still unclear."

https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1850955937663631731

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1850955589184012288/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/__4-Jk3MhbdJ-uxd.mp4

101 comments

101 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (101)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– ScionOfMaga 2 points 62 days ago +2 / -0

I don’t think anyone here would deny that, but I also believe a lot of folks here prefer a nonviolent solution.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Merkava_4 1 point 62 days ago +1 / -0

The non-violent solution is to have Trump in office. If that doesn't happen, there will no non-violent solution. I hate to be the one to tell you that, but that's the reality we're in.