These 98000 aren’t non-citizens, they are people whose driver’s licenses were first issued before 1996. They were supposed to be asked submit some additional proof of citizenship (a license issued after 1996 was automatically good) but owing to a DMV screwup it didn’t happen.
37% of them are registered Republicans.
And this ruling only applies to the races for Arizona state office, they’ve been eligible to vote for federal office (president, VP, senator, representative) all along and unrelated to this case.
Correct. It took me a few rounds to understand it, but we have the typical "read a headline and jump to conclusions" in this thread. Maybe others can understand your explanation.
These 98000 aren’t non-citizens, they are people whose driver’s licenses were first issued before 1996. They were supposed to be asked submit some additional proof of citizenship (a license issued after 1996 was automatically good) but owing to a DMV screwup it didn’t happen.
37% of them are registered Republicans.
And this ruling only applies to the races for Arizona state office, they’ve been eligible to vote for federal office (president, VP, senator, representative) all along and unrelated to this case.
thank you. I'm so sick of this clickbait story.
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/17/arizona-voters-glitch-eligibility-mvd
Correct. It took me a few rounds to understand it, but we have the typical "read a headline and jump to conclusions" in this thread. Maybe others can understand your explanation.
Upvoting fur visibility.