"These people" can't control the weather, any more than a flea can control an elephant. Weather is a statistical phenomenon, which means it will not be smooth and will have upredictable excursions from the norm. That's what makes weather prediction a crapshoot.
You can believe it...but people can believe anything. Intensity of belief is meaningless. You can't prove it and you cant demonstrate it. I live in the midst of continual "weather" and it is beyond controlling. (Hint: nothing is in defiance of physics.)
You don't understand logic. It is not true that all statements are equally possible and that therefore the onus of proof is on the doubter. The onus of proof is always on the person alleging a statement to be true. If you allege zebras exist, then it is on you to provide the doubter with evidence. Likewise, if he alleges leprechauns exist, the onus is not on you to prove they don't exist.
In no way does logic dictate that it is possible to "control" the weather (by which I mean something orders of magnitude more significant than squeezing a little water out of a cloud by seeding). It is a matter of physics. I have had occasion to run the numbers on what it would take to clear an airport runway of incoming fog by evaporating the droplets with an infrared laser. Seems possible, right? Totally wrong. The power requirement is enormous. And that's just fog.
You see, physics is the tangible embodiment of logic. If something is not physically true, then it cannot logically be true. All this reference to HAARP is not based in physics at all, but in superstition. Basically, no one understands it, and they use that lack of understanding to justify the accusation of magical powers. It is like witchcraft. I hate to see people falling back into the Dark Ages.
"These people" can't control the weather, any more than a flea can control an elephant. Weather is a statistical phenomenon, which means it will not be smooth and will have upredictable excursions from the norm. That's what makes weather prediction a crapshoot.
They can't, but that doesn't mean it's impossible. The weather can absolutely 100% be controlled.
You can believe it...but people can believe anything. Intensity of belief is meaningless. You can't prove it and you cant demonstrate it. I live in the midst of continual "weather" and it is beyond controlling. (Hint: nothing is in defiance of physics.)
Hint: You can't prove it isn't true possible either, and logic dictates that it is indeed possible. Retard.
You don't understand logic. It is not true that all statements are equally possible and that therefore the onus of proof is on the doubter. The onus of proof is always on the person alleging a statement to be true. If you allege zebras exist, then it is on you to provide the doubter with evidence. Likewise, if he alleges leprechauns exist, the onus is not on you to prove they don't exist.
In no way does logic dictate that it is possible to "control" the weather (by which I mean something orders of magnitude more significant than squeezing a little water out of a cloud by seeding). It is a matter of physics. I have had occasion to run the numbers on what it would take to clear an airport runway of incoming fog by evaporating the droplets with an infrared laser. Seems possible, right? Totally wrong. The power requirement is enormous. And that's just fog.
You see, physics is the tangible embodiment of logic. If something is not physically true, then it cannot logically be true. All this reference to HAARP is not based in physics at all, but in superstition. Basically, no one understands it, and they use that lack of understanding to justify the accusation of magical powers. It is like witchcraft. I hate to see people falling back into the Dark Ages.