In complete respect of the law, of course.
Any ideas?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
GOWDY
Gowdy was originally on board with Russia, Russia, Russia
Gowdy was mentioned in the drops as being saved for another role
All saddle and no horse.
The drops make me think otherwise
Not me. He was all talk when in congress. Literally got nothing done. I liked him at first, until I woke up and saw he was, at best, the equivalent of a sternly worded letter. I'd love it if he actually did something (same with Jordan.) I don't know what happens to these guys, but it appears someone gets to them and they go all soft noodle on the country.
I understand your point but perhaps he saved his ammunition? If we look at the cases Durham brought and how they were handled/outcome, it was obvious our courts have bias where there shouldn't be any. Look at the trials DJT went through: were they fair and free from bias? Prior to the 2016 election, James Comey stated that "no reasonable prosecutor" would bring a case against Hilary Clinton. A prosecutor's goal=guilty. Definition of reasonable is an ability to reason or "think logically" so he was telling the truth that no prosecutor with the ability to think logically, would bring a case against her because the corrupt"system" would NOT find her guilty even with overwhelming evidence to the contrary. As frustrating as it was to see Gowdy do nothing but a "strongly worded letter" it would have caused outright anger to see her let off the hook by a corrupt system.