This was NEVER a consideration, the last 7 years, and the only reason some poeple are grabbing on to that now is because they think - have concluded - that Pompeo is dirty.
There is a post, which shows Pompeo's hands holding notes, which an anon queries asking if this is potus, given the ring, and Q replies, that it is Kansas. Run a search for Kansas on the map (aka the Q drops) and read them all in the context of each other.
It's 100% clear when you put all the Kansas related drops together, that "Kansas" refers to Pompeo. No serious student of the Q drop thinks otehrwise.
Going elsewhere with that is not "Q", it's "anons", and the reason why Q had to draw a distinction between Q and anons.
I get the temptation to go in such a strange direction, but it really fails logic, evidence, and critical and clear thinking.
human b
human a
human c
human d
human e
"but oh, oh, human d is actually a state that will do a (very minor) action against big pharma 7 years down the road"
Facepalm. Really.
(please feel free to downvote, frens, as I know that some people cannot stand to have their idiotic theories gainsaid or contradicted by rational thinking. Sorry to be harsh, but seriously. Facepalm. )
I feel like an old timer on a submarine and we just got a wave of new recruits who came in and think they know everything about the ship, but know nothing beyond a few training sessions, which they slept through 50% of 🙃
No, seriously. "we didn't"
This was NEVER a consideration, the last 7 years, and the only reason some poeple are grabbing on to that now is because they think - have concluded - that Pompeo is dirty.
There is a post, which shows Pompeo's hands holding notes, which an anon queries asking if this is potus, given the ring, and Q replies, that it is Kansas. Run a search for Kansas on the map (aka the Q drops) and read them all in the context of each other.
It's 100% clear when you put all the Kansas related drops together, that "Kansas" refers to Pompeo. No serious student of the Q drop thinks otehrwise.
Going elsewhere with that is not "Q", it's "anons", and the reason why Q had to draw a distinction between Q and anons.
I get the temptation to go in such a strange direction, but it really fails logic, evidence, and critical and clear thinking.
human b
human a
human c
human d
human e
"but oh, oh, human d is actually a state that will do a (very minor) action against big pharma 7 years down the road"
Facepalm. Really.
(please feel free to downvote, frens, as I know that some people cannot stand to have their idiotic theories gainsaid or contradicted by rational thinking. Sorry to be harsh, but seriously. Facepalm. )
I feel like an old timer on a submarine and we just got a wave of new recruits who came in and think they know everything about the ship, but know nothing beyond a few training sessions, which they slept through 50% of 🙃