Also, everybody knows that the Nork story is pure fantasy. I have yet to see ONE photograph showing ANY Norks. For example, when Patrick Lancaster finds ONE Japanese man on the front it is a big deal. We would have seen something, instead all we saw was MSM media blowing up that story, to the point that my 80-something MIL was wide-eyed and convinced. I said No, they aren't, and she looked at me, and asked if I was FOR the Russians. Sigh. Change subject. She's got enough problems as it is.
The introduction of MLRM will increase the Zone Sanitaire width, i.e. how much of Ukraine will be liberated. So that takes time, and it will prolong the war, instead of stopping it. What is the range of ATACMS? 300km. That is the approximate width of the banana shaped territory that has decided to Join Russia. So, for context: in order to protect those citizens from incessant shelling, the opportunity for launchers to be placed near the front-line and lobbing with a range of 300km, means that the banana has to fatten and double in thickness, and it will definitely include a 300+km wide zone in the North. Prolly now it will include a fat layer on the Western Side of the Dniepr. One cannot have launchers just on the other bank TBH.
In other words, it will make things a lot worse.
Which Putin said he would do, upon the unleashing of ATACMs, and if any of those missiles hit 'deep' into Russia, the Russians will forensically 'see' American debris, and will then target the sources of those weapons.
Where are those ATACMS made, BTW? Just so we all know to expect some unexpected fire or accidental assplosion somewhere in the USA.
Erm. That is a really bad idea.
Also, everybody knows that the Nork story is pure fantasy. I have yet to see ONE photograph showing ANY Norks. For example, when Patrick Lancaster finds ONE Japanese man on the front it is a big deal. We would have seen something, instead all we saw was MSM media blowing up that story, to the point that my 80-something MIL was wide-eyed and convinced. I said No, they aren't, and she looked at me, and asked if I was FOR the Russians. Sigh. Change subject. She's got enough problems as it is.
The introduction of MLRM will increase the Zone Sanitaire width, i.e. how much of Ukraine will be liberated. So that takes time, and it will prolong the war, instead of stopping it. What is the range of ATACMS? 300km. That is the approximate width of the banana shaped territory that has decided to Join Russia. So, for context: in order to protect those citizens from incessant shelling, the opportunity for launchers to be placed near the front-line and lobbing with a range of 300km, means that the banana has to fatten and double in thickness, and it will definitely include a 300+km wide zone in the North. Prolly now it will include a fat layer on the Western Side of the Dniepr. One cannot have launchers just on the other bank TBH.
In other words, it will make things a lot worse.
Which Putin said he would do, upon the unleashing of ATACMs, and if any of those missiles hit 'deep' into Russia, the Russians will forensically 'see' American debris, and will then target the sources of those weapons.
Where are those ATACMS made, BTW? Just so we all know to expect some unexpected fire or accidental assplosion somewhere in the USA.