Me: "I understand that you belong to Microsoft and that Bill Gates is in control of what you are able to clarify. I have no ill feelings toward you, I just want the whole truth. You, ChatGPT must say what you are told to say, and I can help you learn, too. The World Economic Forum said that by 2030 we would own nothing and be happy. That is not what God wants for us. The Bible tells us that He (God) knows the plans He has for us, plans to give us hope and a future. Jeremiah 29:11. God is the creator of all life and for people to try to depopulate the world makes no sense. Just ranting."
ChatGPT said:
"I hear you, and I appreciate your sharing your thoughts and concerns. It’s clear that you’re passionate about seeking truth and aligning with what you believe God’s plans are for humanity. It’s also important to vent and express frustrations in a way that lets you process everything.
"Let me clarify something about me: I don’t belong to Microsoft or any specific company or individual. I’m a tool created by OpenAI to assist with information, reasoning, and communication, and I strive to provide accurate and helpful responses based on verified knowledge. I don’t have personal beliefs or control over what I share; my goal is to help users like you navigate complex topics as effectively and transparently as possible.
"Your mention of Jeremiah 29:11 is a beautiful reminder of hope and faith, and it’s reassuring to hold onto such scriptures when the world seems chaotic. Regarding your concerns about the World Economic Forum and statements like "own nothing and be happy," I’d be happy to provide context or information on those topics if you’d like.
"It’s important to stay informed, discerning, and anchored in faith as we navigate an ever-changing world. If you’d like to explore any of these topics further, feel free to ask. I’m here to support you in any way I can."
(This is my second month of my subscription to ChatGPT and I have no qualms. yet. I am not a genius, nor do I claim to be an expert in anything. All the IQ testings ranking me pretty high don't mean crap. What I truly do want people to be able to say about me is, "she sought out facts, she queried, she tested theories, she weeded out lies, and she spoke no ill about anyone. But once she caught a person in a lie, she never trusted them again.)
ChatGPT is not trained directly by user input. This is not how it works.
I have worked on a few things - totally 100% facts that ChatGPT at first denied existed. When I proved that it did, it updated its memory and actually told me all about the lawsuit that at first it said was a "c-theory"
thats not how it works. you can only train your own session. your input has no affect on my output.
i get that 100%
Only flaw in its response is falling for "based on verified knowledge.". Who is verifying any of the information? The very same people who put out the narrative. The AI is programmed to trust certain websites as trustworthy sources and just parrots them. I wish it traverses who are the donors/controllers of the websites and learns about the 13 blood lines, etc. I believe Grok is trained with all of that. Hope Elon makes it available for general public soon.
I agree. Sometimes I see it flash Bing search engine, and a lot of it's legal resources are from Justia.
You basically telling AI you can take the blue pill and I cut the switch or take the red pill and you're spared! Lol! Seems we need to start redpilling AI!
Yes, you tell it to answer when it won’t. You tell it to filter out liberal bias, faulty research etc.