Your initial comment needed more context, It was a bit ambiguous, because you started out with questioning what defines a climate related death and then proposing a reasoning that all death is "climate-related".
I'm assuming you aren't a communist, so at this juncture, I can only interpret your comment as a foray into sarcasm, from "what.... to right?". In which case, it makes more sense.
Almost a satirical criticism of the way that Marxism and political satanism twists language and subverts it to their malignant agenda, as opposed to lifting up language as an instrument for truth and freedom.
Ah, ok.
Your initial comment needed more context, It was a bit ambiguous, because you started out with questioning what defines a climate related death and then proposing a reasoning that all death is "climate-related".
I'm assuming you aren't a communist, so at this juncture, I can only interpret your comment as a foray into sarcasm, from "what.... to right?". In which case, it makes more sense.
Almost a satirical criticism of the way that Marxism and political satanism twists language and subverts it to their malignant agenda, as opposed to lifting up language as an instrument for truth and freedom.
Point taken.