It depends on who controls it, as with most things.
Would we be against something that was cheap, accessible, and had no way of being undermined or hijacked if it could indeed solve problems many people face?
If someone here were going deaf or blind, and this could reverse it, would we be against it? Modern medicine does save lives. The support Ivermectin has here is a testament to that. I believe modern medicine is a product of God, since it's a product of us, who ourselves are a product of him. That doesn't preclude it from being used for evil, let alone for good.
The trick is figuring out the safeguards while ensuring neither the government or companies can abuse any of it in any way.
It depends on who controls it, as with most things.
Would we be against something that was cheap, accessible, and had no way of being undermined or hijacked if it could indeed solve problems many people face?
If someone here were going deaf or blind, and this could reverse it, would we be against it? Modern medicine does save lives. The support Ivermectin has here is a testament to that. I believe modern medicine is a product of God, since it's a product of us, who ourselves are a product of him. That doesn't preclude it from being used for evil, let alone for good.
The trick is figuring out the safeguards while ensuring neither the government or companies can abuse any of it in any way.