4 short video clips that explain everything that needs to be understood --
Ken O'Keefe on the lies of history:
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/168/480/465/playable/db99e37cb200c0f8.mp4
David Irving on the fact that the "Holocaust" and "gas chambers" story was invented by British intelligence as a psyop cover story to deflect from Soviet war crimes:
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/166/584/357/playable/98d3aa66fc7e279a.mp4
Irving again on the fact that there are NO documents in the archives to support the "official" fake narrative of the Holocaust (such documents do not exist because it did not happen -- it always was, and still is, a psyop):
https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/143/048/370/original/502dbb6bcf156916.mp4
Ryan Messano about what (and why) things are happening today:
Response (1 of 2):
And you sound both immature and ignorant.
Starting off with ad hominem only shows your inability to debate a subject.
Appeal to authority is also a fallacy and not substance.
Again, with immature ad hominem, and nothing of substance on the topic.
You did not live there during the Stalin and Hitler years.
You and the Russians have been gaslighted and lied to about this topic, just like has been done to the Germans, the Americans, the Brits, and everyone else.
I don't give a FUCK what emotions drive people to irrational thoughts.
I care about what EVIDENCE can be presented to support a claim.
You have presented NONE.
I have not looked into the Soviet laws on usury or gold standard.
A quick search turned up a Wiki page about the Soviet Ruble (Russian Ruble was outlawed), where they did have some that were backed by gold and others that were not.
But this is weird:
This implies that any gold standard there was didn't work out so well, which is weird.
I also found a statement by someone claiming to know about usury in the USSR, and he stated that there was interest paid on bank accounts and interest on loans was a complicated system. He also said it didn't matter much because nobody could own any property -- no car purchases, no real estate purchases.
Contrast that to Germany where Hitler created the Volkswagon (the "people's car") for everyone to own one, created the autobahn for everyone to get around the country, and a housing program where everyone could own their own home. For each child born, 1/4 of the mortgage was forgiven. Have 4 children, and you own your own home free and clear.
So, don't feed me anymore bullshit about how Stalin was the same as Uncle Adolph. Slavery in the USSR; freedom in "Nazi" Germany.
Here is an account of a "Hitler Youth" member and what life was like in Germany from 1935-1945:
"Living in Adolf Hitler's Germany" --
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iEP3VtQ9ZTbR/
If you are trying to convince me that Stalin was a power-hungry monster, save your typing fingers. I agree. He and Mao were the two most evil monsters in the history of the Earth.
Where I will not agree is if you put Hitler into that same category. Because that would be a bald-faced jewish gaslighted lie.
None of your statements about Stalin have anything to do with the FACT that the Holocaust is a jewish lie.
You made the claim that Hitler was used as a pawn so Rothschild could "get control back of the USSR" and I pointed out that they already had control.
If your claim is that Stalin later got control of the USSR from the jews and they used Hitler to get it back, I would say that is not likely.
The jewish-controlled Britain and the jewish-controlled USA wanted the jewish-controlled USSR on the Eastern Front so that Germany would be surrounded. They wanted to take out Germany because it had become an economic threat by having such great success under Hitler's economic policy. Germany had become the #1 economy in the world in just 5 years.
In hindsight, yes. That is because Stalin double-crossed him.
Stalin's plan was to take over all of Europe, though, and Hitler did stop that.
The jews -- not only those in Russia, but also the jewish bankers who funded the operation in New York and London -- were the ones who overthrew the czar and formed the Soviet Union, instituting a system of slavery of the Russian people.
The Russians had no problem with the czar. It was outsiders -- jews and those they hired from other countries -- who did the dirty work of the takeover, and then slaughtered millions of Russians.
If Stalin then gained control though his evil secret police and murderous actions, I will agree.
That does not change the FACT that jews were the ones who overthrew Russia and it was jews who were behind the mass murder of Russians early on, and also during Stalin's years.
The Weimar Republic in Germany started in 1919 and lasted until Hitler took over in 1933. Stalin came to power in 1922.
If he got rid of the faggots in the 1920's, and if Moscow was the depravity capital of Europe at that time, it is only because the jews were the ones in control until Stalin walked in the door.
Then they must have moved their depravity to Berlin, which became the new European capital of degeneracy, until Hitler walked in the door.
NONE OF THIS has anything to do with YOUR CLAIM that Hitler was some sort of puppet of Roth. In fact, this only shows the similarities of Stalin and Hitler regarding cleaning up the degeneracy.
But their similarities are few. Hitler's Germany was a paradise compared to Stalin's USSR.
I have not looked into Stalin nearly as much as I have Hitler.
The lies about Stalin are to make him look good when in fact he was evil.
The lies about Hitler are to make him look evil when in fact he was good.
Big difference -- at least, to me.
OK.
All USSR citizens were FUCKING SLAVES.
NO PROPERTY.
So, who cares about interest?
The same could be said of the slaves in Mississippi in 1820.
That would be counter to communism, as communism demands conformity.
See: China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea.
You want me to believe that the USSR was a special brand of communism? I don't.
So did I. And my parents could own a house.
They could also leave their country and travel around the world.
The Soviets could not.
Which years are you talking about?
Pre- or Post-1991?
Germany was the #1 economy in the world under Hitler, so OF COURSE there would be A LOT of economic trade -- especially the usual deep state suspects.
Response (2 of 2):
The Bush family was/is a crime syndicate.
You will get no argument from me.
Samuel Bush was buddies with Rockefeller and accused of illegal weapons dealing with Germans in WW1.
He and Prescott both were investigated under the Trading with the Enemies Act circa WW2.
Yes, I know.
Reminder: The people who lived in those locations were ethnic Germans, who had lived in "Germany" prior to WW1, and suddenly the borders were moved post-WW1. They wanted to rejoin Germany, and Hitler made it happen.
You think the fact that nobody immediately went to war proves that Hitler was a puppet?
I don't.
There was a Great Depression going on at the time, and no will among the people of Europe or USA to go right back to war again. The was just 10-15 years later.
How strong was Germany -- REALLY?
As late as 1941, 75% of the German military supply lines were handled by horses.
The world looked a lot different then vs. now.
England, France, etc. had a tough time convincing anyone, including their own people, that they should go to war just because some Germans were reuniting with their brothers and sisters.
I don't see the hidden story that you do.
I am saying ONE PRIMARY thing:
THE HOLOCAUST WAS AND IS FAKE.
You have provided NO EVIDENCE, NO ARGUMENT, NOTHING AT ALL to refute that, while I posted at least some info from people who have throuroghly researched the topic, and I studied the subject a lot.
We can each make up our own minds, but there is NO QUESTION that this is a fact: YOU HAVE PROVIDED NOTHING BUT RED HERRING AFTER RED HERRING.
You have not even bothered to respond to the subject, so that is the end of the "debate," as I see it.
You are a FUCKING LIAR.
I have provided information to back up my claim.
It is YOU who have provided nothing on this subject, and your various other statements (which are unrelated) have nothing to back them up other than your own statements.
I could no find anything on a quick search about Stalin and banning usury -- not that it is releveant at all to this debate, but at least I looked it up.
I doubt you have bothered to look into anything that I have provided.
You continue with stupid ad hominems that are not only objectively false, but also an attempt to gaslight and derail the discussion.
LOL. You don't even see your own self-contradiction.
You mean "anti-jew" laws. Jews are not semites.
And it is the jews who are responsible for those laws, not anyone who died 80 years ago.
Stalin was evil. I already agreed with you on that.
But ... AGAIN ...
That has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT ... that the Holocause was and is a ... LIE.
You have done nothing at all to refute that point.
The video you cited is very interesting.
First, it is a list of quotes from several books that the creator of the video decided to put into his video.
The time period is 1941, right after Operation Barbarossa.
I watched an interview of Benton Bradberry, who wrote a book about the Germans during the Hitler years. He stated that he was fascinated about this time period and had read dozens of books on the subject.
After awhile, he started to question some of these anti-Hitler books because he would see photos that were claimed to be different things in different books. He would read ridiculous accounts of stories claiming all sorts of things.
He eventually did his own research and wrote his own book.
Some of the quotes in this video are the types he mentioned were just made up. I don't know, and I don't have a lifetime to research it in detail.
I do note that the creator of your video has another video where he is "sounding the alarm" at the "problem" that AI is being used now to translate Adolf Hitler's speeches into other languages, so people can see for themselves what Hitler was acutally saying in those fiery speeches.
Haven't you ever noticed that [they] want you to see his body language when he spoke but [they] don't seem to want to show you what he actually SAID?
That has always puzzled me.
This guy is worried that AI is changing that and spreading Hitler's "harmful ideas to the world." He thinks this is a serious problem.
That tells me his bias, just like Bradberry talked about.
But regardless ...
YOU STILL HAVE PROVIDED NOTHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST.
So, these side stories are interesting, but there is only so much time.
I'm sure you can. But I can't.
LOL. I respond almost point-for-point.
Unlike you.
Good luck. I see nothing productive from this discussion, since you have spent a lot of time on interesting topics, but not THIS topic that I raised.
Nothing you said addressed the issues of (a) there are NO documents to support any aspect of the Holocaust story, (b) there are documents that DO support the hidden story of the British intel psyop which created the fake Holocaust story, and (c) the jews have been gaslighting you, me, and everyone else for nearly a century, and it is time we learn the truth.
Maybe AI will help in that.
So, thanks for leading me to that tip.
LOL.
One final thought --
You obviously think Hitler was evil.
That is a conclusion you have reached, based on ideas you believe.
Like almost eveyone else, one of those things you believe, which lead you to the conclusion that Hitler was evil, is the Holocaust.
All I am really saying in this thread is that you have to remove the Holocaust as one of your reasons, because the Holocaust is a lie.
The evidence supports my position, not yours.
So, take that one out of your "bag or reasons why I hate Hitler," and then rethink it.
I plan to do some reasearch on the AI translations of Hitler's speeches.
Should be interesting.