They have temporary dominion of earth. We are the pawns and the prizes, this is war. Most people don’t know this but God declared it in Genesis, notice that there are TWO seeds. Genesis 3:14-15 (NKJV) 14 So the LORD God said to the serpent: “Because you have done this, You [are] cursed more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you shall go, And you shall eat dust All the days of your life. 15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.”
You’ll also notice that God wins in the end.
So, the TWO seeds, one is the Christ, who is the other? Genesis 6:1-4 (NKJV) 1 Now it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, 2 that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they [were] beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose. 3 And the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he [is] indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” 4 There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore [children] to them. Those [were] the mighty men who [were] of old, men of renown.
The whole genesis narrative is very interestingly written, and I don’t have a firm interpretation on any of it, to be clear.
Genesis 1:26-28 “man” is created. Now, “man” is translated from “ 'āḏām”, interestingly, so that would be a case against this option.
Then Genesis 2, God rested on the 7th day, then God created man (also from “'āḏām”) and breathed a soul into him.
Later, when referring to “Adam” it comes from the same “'āḏām“
That would be the source of the issue I’m discussing, where it could appear that “man” was created twice, but as shown here, that could very easily be a translation issue resulting from narrative decisions.
On the other two seeds you mention, I tend to agree and think that’s a more solid case.
To clarify though, I said “might” because it could very easily just be a translation quirk I’m referring to, grown out of just not knowing enough source and/or original context.
The second mention of man being created goes into more detail as to how we were made by God, the Bible is a human story, we’re the stars of the show so of course there will be a focus on us. I see only two seeds because God only mentions two. Just my take on things.
That’s the other English reading of it. In English, I do think both readings could be valid. As I was writing it though, I realized I hadn’t gone to the translation on this thought, and the source text does not seem to allow the same notable ambiguities that the English text does.
If you read closely, you can hear me disproving my own claims as I dug into more of the supporting source reasoning for the thought.
Perhaps the reason they translated it that way was for narrative flow, or to assist in memorization or some such. It’s amazing how many times digging into the source language can knock bad ideas off their perches!
I won't bow to these fake ass light bringers. They can go felatio their god the devil. God Jesus Christ will kill all you fake ass bitches from the abyss.
if you fear God and not Satan, you will ignore the negative theories about UFOs and ETs.
After a decade of studying this topic, that is the best advice I can give.
If you still fear satan, you have no fear for God.
When it comes to spiritual matters... If something sounds evil, it's a lie.
Seek out positive information. Dismiss the rest as fear porn. You will find the truth.
And our protection.
I believe they've always been around.
But if they really wanted the earth for themselves they could have done that long ago. So I am more interested than worried.
They have temporary dominion of earth. We are the pawns and the prizes, this is war. Most people don’t know this but God declared it in Genesis, notice that there are TWO seeds. Genesis 3:14-15 (NKJV) 14 So the LORD God said to the serpent: “Because you have done this, You [are] cursed more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you shall go, And you shall eat dust All the days of your life. 15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel.” You’ll also notice that God wins in the end. So, the TWO seeds, one is the Christ, who is the other? Genesis 6:1-4 (NKJV) 1 Now it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, 2 that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they [were] beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose. 3 And the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he [is] indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” 4 There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore [children] to them. Those [were] the mighty men who [were] of old, men of renown.
Might even be three seeds, 6th day, and the two branches of 8th day - with the two 8th each trying to win the 6th.
Two branches is a new one to me, what are you referring to?
The whole genesis narrative is very interestingly written, and I don’t have a firm interpretation on any of it, to be clear.
Genesis 1:26-28 “man” is created. Now, “man” is translated from “ 'āḏām”, interestingly, so that would be a case against this option.
Then Genesis 2, God rested on the 7th day, then God created man (also from “'āḏām”) and breathed a soul into him.
Later, when referring to “Adam” it comes from the same “'āḏām“
That would be the source of the issue I’m discussing, where it could appear that “man” was created twice, but as shown here, that could very easily be a translation issue resulting from narrative decisions.
On the other two seeds you mention, I tend to agree and think that’s a more solid case.
To clarify though, I said “might” because it could very easily just be a translation quirk I’m referring to, grown out of just not knowing enough source and/or original context.
The second mention of man being created goes into more detail as to how we were made by God, the Bible is a human story, we’re the stars of the show so of course there will be a focus on us. I see only two seeds because God only mentions two. Just my take on things.
That’s the other English reading of it. In English, I do think both readings could be valid. As I was writing it though, I realized I hadn’t gone to the translation on this thought, and the source text does not seem to allow the same notable ambiguities that the English text does.
If you read closely, you can hear me disproving my own claims as I dug into more of the supporting source reasoning for the thought.
Perhaps the reason they translated it that way was for narrative flow, or to assist in memorization or some such. It’s amazing how many times digging into the source language can knock bad ideas off their perches!
👍
I won't bow to these fake ass light bringers. They can go felatio their god the devil. God Jesus Christ will kill all you fake ass bitches from the abyss.