The discussion that bumped me into finding this short clip from bongino discussed the anti-Flynn agenda. (Up until recent times I've had a relatively dismissive attitude towards bongino, considering him perhaps close to controlled oppo, but certainly not anon level, active in the mainstream maga sphere.)

One of the key focuses of the live X discussion was specifically about gathering and compiling the factual evidence that refutes the "very troubling questions" that you allude to here. The tone, content and direction of the discussion felt very hinged and based to me. Folks who want to attack, destroy truth do not generally have open discussions about fact compilation.

Rather, the shills have a very pronounced approach and tone, in my experience. There is a very similar vibration. It hinges on accusation, triggering of emotional reactions vs engaging unemotional critical thinking.

Never substance, just angry grade-school name-calling nonsense from “name brand anons” and their satellites

Exactly what I see from the shill quarters, and specifically in their attacks against people like Flynn. Quite absent from the discussion I tuned in to, by the way.

I'm not particularly familiar with Guitaranon17, but I resonated with the perspectives, and moving through his feed I came across the clip from Bongino.

I'm not going to put Roger Stone and Flynn in the same bag.

I have had a LOT of information on Flynn since 2018, and the attacks bear plenty of the hallmarks of disinformation operations that only fools would deny are real and active in the Great Awakening and Truth spheres.