Think logically. What Trump said about General Kellogg at the rally. What we know this far. Trump, Flynn & Kellogg are 100% part of Q. I think most other at this point are debatable. Though Musk is looking a lot more each day like he is part too.
Hmmm... I guess we have different definitions of "know"! Trump, yes, we know. Flynn and Kellogg, logically we might be sure, but logic isn't everything. So for me, I don't put it in the category of "know 100%".
Musk, I strongly suspect that he was involved bigtime, and when he began posting Q memes, pepes and stuff, with plausible deniability, "Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here" just fit perfectly for me. I've thought there is a very high probability that Musk is part of Q for about 2 years now.
But here's the point: we were MEANT to know that DJT is Q+, that he is part of the Q operation. But we are not meant 'to know' about any of the others. Plenty of hints, data and info to lead to that conclusion when followed logically, etc, but "knowing" is not part of the requirement.
So, I'm not going to tell myself "I know 100%" that they are Q. I don't need to, and I think that mentality isn't helpful to what I want to achieve (i.e. mental and intellectual discipline).
So like I said, I guess we just have different definitions of what "know" means.
Another point: "being certain about something" is not the same things as knowing, in my view. Being certain about something is a conviction. it's a choice of belief based on (plenty of different things, including feeling, logic, facts, etc). But it's not identical to "knowing".
Think logically. What Trump said about General Kellogg at the rally. What we know this far. Trump, Flynn & Kellogg are 100% part of Q. I think most other at this point are debatable. Though Musk is looking a lot more each day like he is part too.
Hmmm... I guess we have different definitions of "know"! Trump, yes, we know. Flynn and Kellogg, logically we might be sure, but logic isn't everything. So for me, I don't put it in the category of "know 100%".
Musk, I strongly suspect that he was involved bigtime, and when he began posting Q memes, pepes and stuff, with plausible deniability, "Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here" just fit perfectly for me. I've thought there is a very high probability that Musk is part of Q for about 2 years now.
But here's the point: we were MEANT to know that DJT is Q+, that he is part of the Q operation. But we are not meant 'to know' about any of the others. Plenty of hints, data and info to lead to that conclusion when followed logically, etc, but "knowing" is not part of the requirement.
So, I'm not going to tell myself "I know 100%" that they are Q. I don't need to, and I think that mentality isn't helpful to what I want to achieve (i.e. mental and intellectual discipline).
So like I said, I guess we just have different definitions of what "know" means.
Another point: "being certain about something" is not the same things as knowing, in my view. Being certain about something is a conviction. it's a choice of belief based on (plenty of different things, including feeling, logic, facts, etc). But it's not identical to "knowing".