Your reason is in opposition to your argument. Surely to be protected you would always want your own security people, whoever you were. Being escorted by security under someone elses chain of command, without your own people, is less safe no? Perhaps I misunderstand and we agree, but typo?
In international settings, Trump has his own security. In host country settings, Trump's security is managed by foreign countries. This is not to say Trump has no SS with him, just that they are not right next to him.
Your reason is in opposition to your argument. Surely to be protected you would always want your own security people, whoever you were. Being escorted by security under someone elses chain of command, without your own people, is less safe no? Perhaps I misunderstand and we agree, but typo?
unless, you were always an asset, or were under submission.. then you would be escorted by someone else's people.
You're not wrong. But it is how it is done.
In international settings, Trump has his own security. In host country settings, Trump's security is managed by foreign countries. This is not to say Trump has no SS with him, just that they are not right next to him.