A hundred or more labs, governments, universities around the world, all on record that they don't have any virus samples, and don't know of any lab that does.
A computer constructed genome does not a virus make (or anything else). Too many people continue to "follow the science" even when it points to a text printout that has zero relation to the real world.
Why do we store deadly viruses? How else are the deep staters going to start pandemics?
Of what use are they? For deep state to take them, think of is like a savings account and the owner came to collect.
Is that use worth the risk? Depends on who needs the virus. If it is a deep state, then it's not a risk cause it is by design to "get robbed". If it is someone who is not a deep state then this type is situation does not cross their door.
Allegedly, these viruses are "plague" level events; and they are kept and researched to find a cure, so if they were released by an enemy; we would have a cure we would respond with.
However, if the enemy is weaponizing a virus; don't we need to weaponize a different virus in response? Yes, this is madness. Bioweapons are not defensive in nature, they are offensive (and banned by the Bioweapons Convention).
Gain of function has already been abused - which imho should involve the death penalty as a Crime against Humanity.
One reason this is researched, is some virus's (no matter where inserted) will seek a specific organ. Tuberculosis for example, will seek the lungs. The fantasy is to take the tuberculosis virus, remove that which causes harm, and replace it with a specific payload (such as a gene to cure asthma), so one huff off a mask and a week later you no longer have asthma, etc. But is the risk worth the reward?
Can someone explain why we store deadly viruses? Of what use are they and is that use worth the risk?
There are no viruses.
A hundred or more labs, governments, universities around the world, all on record that they don't have any virus samples, and don't know of any lab that does.
https://rumble.com/v5rg818-the-end-of-virology-once-again-webinar-from-november-20th-2024-dr.tom-cowan.html
So, whatever they are doing with "gain of function," is about something else.
Probably vaxx, since that is a direct injection and can be isolated to select individuals.
A computer constructed genome does not a virus make (or anything else). Too many people continue to "follow the science" even when it points to a text printout that has zero relation to the real world.
Simple.
Allegedly, these viruses are "plague" level events; and they are kept and researched to find a cure, so if they were released by an enemy; we would have a cure we would respond with.
However, if the enemy is weaponizing a virus; don't we need to weaponize a different virus in response? Yes, this is madness. Bioweapons are not defensive in nature, they are offensive (and banned by the Bioweapons Convention).
Gain of function has already been abused - which imho should involve the death penalty as a Crime against Humanity.
One reason this is researched, is some virus's (no matter where inserted) will seek a specific organ. Tuberculosis for example, will seek the lungs. The fantasy is to take the tuberculosis virus, remove that which causes harm, and replace it with a specific payload (such as a gene to cure asthma), so one huff off a mask and a week later you no longer have asthma, etc. But is the risk worth the reward?