DOJ Threatens J-6 Detainees: Accepting A Pardon From President Trump Is An Admission Of Guilt (So...Use The Amnesty Option?) *INFOWARS* WARNING
(www.infowars.com)
🏛️ PANIC IN DC 🏛️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
"In a court filing Wednesday for a Jan. 6 case before Washington, D.C. district judge Carl Nichols, federal prosecutors asserted that accepting a presidential pardon, “which is purely speculative at this juncture,” actually “necessitates a confession of guilt.”
“[A] pardon at some unspecified date in the future…would not unring the bell of conviction,” federal prosecutors argued. “In fact, quite the opposite. The defendant would first have to accept the pardon, which necessitates a confession of guilt.”"
Not if the pardon is like the one being handed out to Crackhead and others.
By their logic, anyone that accepts a FJB pardon would have to plead guilty to federal crimes and they should then lose any and all pensions and security clearances for life.
LOL, 5D Chess at it's finest.
I don't buy for one second the zany notion that accepting a pardon automatically means admitting guilt or wrongdoing.
If I had been taken hostage by the rogue govt that committed a coup d'etat on J6, and I was wrongfully imprisoned just for exercising my 1st Amendment rights to free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom to petition the govt for redress of greivances,...I'd damn sure take a pardon to not languish for the rest of my life in solitary confinement, for example. And that wouldn't be admitting jack shit, except that I wanted out of that hellhole.
They AREN'T guilty of anything; their imprisonment is flagrantly political and unconstitutional; and none who accept a pardon should be regarded as admitting any guilt whatsoever. The legal principle that acceptance of a pardon always constitutes an admission of guilt is simply misguided and wrong.