The constitution is about what .gov cannot do. The measure is unconstitutional.
The end.
Whether illegal or not, a man has rights, even before a constitutional argument can be fielded. But, the question is, whether the trustees of the Constitution are allowed to extend the protections of the Constitution to such people.
If someone is illegal, is there a contract, a mutual agreement? Nope.
The constitution is about what .gov cannot do. The measure is unconstitutional. The end.
Whether illegal or not, a man has rights, even before a constitutional argument can be fielded. But, the question is, whether the trustees of the Constitution are allowed to extend the protections of the Constitution to such people.
If someone is illegal, is there a contract, a mutual agreement? Nope.