I would argue it like this... (devil's advocate, defending this wording by X): If someone from any violent event denies that it happened this could be a valid flag. However, if someone were to say a violent event didn't actually occur - like questioning it as a narrative like Sandy Hook is that actually denying the violent event? I say its not... I would argue its claiming the reporting of it hasn't been correct. It happened in that it was an event so don't deny that - but questioning things about it isn't denying it. So if someone brings up the convenient lottery winnings from some of the "victim's" families that not denying anything. Ya, ok, I'm not doing a good job of this.