The Holocaust.
Sandy Hook.
Oct. 7th.
The CEO assassination.
The "murder" of George Floyd.
Who caused 9/11.
If you deny people the will to question Trump's assassination attempt, then you deny everyone the right to criticize or question any detail in any historical event.
did I mention 'everyone' being denied... I'm not talking about 'people questioning' I'm saying the press should not be able to deny that violent events occured when there is plenty of evidence to the contrary
of course ordinary people can think whatever the f* they want, but ordinary people are not guiding public opinion, or being paid with tax dollars.
listen to JFKs speech on the press and their responsibilities to the American public.
do you have an example? mine would be President Trump's assassination attempt. we all saw it, but many claim it didn't happen. they 'deny' it.
should we allow that? Or should they be held accountable for accepting tax payer dollars, but gaslighting, withholding & morphing the news.
I think an event either happens, or it doesn't. to 'deny' would be to 'lie'
it's withholding the truth, and sharing false information.
perhaps you have another way to explain what I'm missing ...
The Holocaust. Sandy Hook. Oct. 7th. The CEO assassination. The "murder" of George Floyd. Who caused 9/11.
If you deny people the will to question Trump's assassination attempt, then you deny everyone the right to criticize or question any detail in any historical event.
did I mention 'everyone' being denied... I'm not talking about 'people questioning' I'm saying the press should not be able to deny that violent events occured when there is plenty of evidence to the contrary
of course ordinary people can think whatever the f* they want, but ordinary people are not guiding public opinion, or being paid with tax dollars.
listen to JFKs speech on the press and their responsibilities to the American public.