Ummmm.. why was potentially exonerating evidence, that could have defused worldwide riots, denied access?
Did they want to ensure he was guilty and stoke riots? Wouldn’t that make the judges and lawyers responsible for the ruling legally liable for damages?
Ummmm.. why was potentially exonerating evidence, that could have defused worldwide riots, denied access?
Did they want to ensure he was guilty and stoke riots? Wouldn’t that make the judges and lawyers responsible for the ruling legally liable for damages?
Huh. Interesting.