https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/6/d/6dae7b82-7683-4f56-a177-ba98695e600d/145DD5A70E967DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf

Go to page 65.

I'm suspicious of the purpose and intent behind this item in the report, which is a congressional report.

At the end of the section on Finding 1 (To do with Miller), the report writes:

In fact, the DoD IG Report concludes that that “the decisions made by Mr. Miller [Acting Secretary of Defense]” and “actions taken by the DoD in response to the civil disturbance at the U.S. Capitol Campus on January 6, 2021, were reasonable in light of the circumstances.” The DoD IG Report also “looked for a role or responsibility for the DoD to act preemptively to prevent or deter what later happened at the Capitol. We found none.”

The “independent watchdog” failed to examine or consider the January 3, 2021, directives from President Trump— which Acting Secretary of Defense Miller and Chairman Milley confirmed, in sworn testimony—as adequate evidence that DoD should have played a role in preventing the breach of the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021

What do we know?

One, that the 'breach of the Capital' was a DS operation, a false flag to prevent Senate Review of the electoral college votes,

Two, that it was an operation to smear Trump as an insurrectionist and ideally prevent him from running for office again

Three, it was fundamentally piss-weak and the so-called 'breach' was never really a serious security threat, except where DS actors (including fedboys, the DNC police, Ukrainian activists, etc) aggressively instigated violence.

One wonders if the intent of this congressional subcommittee is to perpetuate those falsehoods, that the 'breach of the capital' etc, was a failure of Trump Team (including Miller), that there was ever a serious threat, etc.

THe report speaks of the DoD IG as an "independent watchdog" in QUOTES, ie. a smear to say, the DoD IG is NOT reliable as an independent watchdog.

Look what they did with the tiny infractions of 'breach' on J6. How do you think it would have gone down if Acting Sec Miller had deployed soldiers?

They had a plan: "“we’ve got a plan, and we’ve got it covered.”

Deploying military would NOT have made the entire event safer. Instead, it would have exacerbated the outcome by 100 fold.

This report is attempting to smear Miller. Surprised that MJTruthUltra didn't go into this more.

To respond to OP:

"Hey Frogs, I STILL think Chris Miller is a good guy"

Jeepers. Let's not be dumb tadpoles.