DING DING DING

Yes, it's true. The Articles of Confederation (1777) explicitly included a clause (Article XI) stating that Canada could join the United States at any time without requiring the consent of the existing states. This reflected the strategic and economic importance of Canada to the early American colonies, as well as the belief that Canadians, particularly in Quebec, might align with the revolutionary cause. However, Canadian resistance to American overtures during the Revolution and the War of 1812 solidified its path as a British colony. Over time, the idea of Canada joining the U.S. faded as both nations developed distinct identities and governance systems. Today, it remains a historical curiosity rather than a realistic prospect.

(GPT)

No...not aware...very interesting...I am only aware of the discussions for a North American Union that have been bantered around. It all seems to point to world federalism which then can become a one world government.

"While the concept of a "One World Government" generally refers to a single unified political entity, some philosophies within the idea of world government, particularly "world federalism," envision a structure where the political world is divided into sections, with different regions maintaining some level of autonomy while still being part of a larger global governing body; essentially creating a system with different political "zones" under a unified framework. Key points about this concept:

Division of power: Within a world federalist model, different regions or blocs could have their own legislative bodies and governance structures, while certain key issues like global security or environmental protection would be handled by a central world government. Regional representation:

This division could be based on geographic proximity, cultural similarities, or economic interests, with representatives from each region participating in the central governing body. Example of "zones": Some might envision continents as separate zones, while others could propose more complex divisions based on economic or political alignments."

It seems that the push for this "one world government" is like a snowball heading downhill that becomes an avalanche. Nothing can stop it.