CANADA/USA ANNEXATION SUPER-THREAD! RumoUrs are that Trump isn't just blustering about making Canada the 51st state! What do you guys think? Let's all put on our 'big boy pants' and share serious details on what you think will need to make this marriage work!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🍁 Marriage Proposal? 🍁
I am not sure.
I think fusing large countries is in the direction of globalism and it makes for less competition between governance styles.
The NWO wanted to erase all borders so that there is only a one world government and no ability to vote with your feet (as you are doing).
countries' borders are a firebreak for tyranny.
I agree...absolutely on point...are we moving towards global governance...does one world government/religion ring a bell?
You are aware that the idea of Canada joining the USA goes back 250 years, with even the Articles of Confederation having an explicit clause for allowing Canada to join the then USA.
DING DING DING
(GPT)
No...not aware...very interesting...I am only aware of the discussions for a North American Union that have been bantered around. It all seems to point to world federalism which then can become a one world government.
"While the concept of a "One World Government" generally refers to a single unified political entity, some philosophies within the idea of world government, particularly "world federalism," envision a structure where the political world is divided into sections, with different regions maintaining some level of autonomy while still being part of a larger global governing body; essentially creating a system with different political "zones" under a unified framework. Key points about this concept:
Division of power: Within a world federalist model, different regions or blocs could have their own legislative bodies and governance structures, while certain key issues like global security or environmental protection would be handled by a central world government. Regional representation:
This division could be based on geographic proximity, cultural similarities, or economic interests, with representatives from each region participating in the central governing body. Example of "zones": Some might envision continents as separate zones, while others could propose more complex divisions based on economic or political alignments."
It seems that the push for this "one world government" is like a snowball heading downhill that becomes an avalanche. Nothing can stop it.
Seems like a description of the US - Fed gov and State gov
Within a
world federalistNational model, differentregions or blocsStates could have their own legislative bodies and governance structures, while certain key issues likeglobalNational security or environmental protection would be handled bya central worldthe Federal government.Define "large countries." If you're talking strictly land mass that's one thing. If you're talking population, the entire population of Canada is roughly equal to the population of California. That's not a lot of people, all considered.
Given what the globe is going through right now, in this case I think it would work geographically and culturally (that last word I even write with a twinge as it's been so twisted over the years!). Huge lengthy border with them, we have Alaska at the other end but still have to do international travel to get there. If they're good with it, I would be.
Not sure how we'd come up with a new flag design though. Same star pattern, just add a slightly larger one above the top in the shape of a maple leaf?? :D
Maybe, fren.
I was just making a general point.
No worries, and it's a good point. Whether people realize it or not, Trump/Musk appear to be for the most part managing the reins of a one world government at the moment, but for the betterment of everyone. Using "whitemail" instead of "blackmail" to get non-conforming leaders into being part of the good plan. Scarry point we're at for sure.
When you think about it, individual states in the US allowed people to "vote with their feet" and move to another state if they didn't like how their state was run. Rough to do, but this theoretically took power away from the state not managing their government properly, reducing their power. Obviously we've gotten to the point where there was so much corruption, there were few "clean" states you could move to, but at least you were still a US citizen going this route.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around "okay, what do we do different NOW that didn't work before?". It's clear that the early concept of the US model for government really shook the established monarchies/dictatorships for a loop. Even with secret society types apparently scattered within the original US leadership, it took the global cabal 3 worldwide meetings and almost 100 years of manipulation to regain a foothold in the US via the Organic Act of 1871 after bankrupting us with a Civil War. Now we appear to have much of the worldwide cabal outed and facing justice. If we tweak our original US model correctly, other countries could potentially copy and tweak it as well for their own independent model. Just thinking out loud here.
Exactly. Doesn't anyone remember the NAU (North American Union) push or the suggested introduction of the "Amero" currency back about 20-25 years ago? This is right out of the deep state playbook. I'm not willing to believe that this is all one big psyop to further that agenda, at least not yet. I don't think Trump is THAT guy.
Exactly. I remember a while back the globohomos wanted the US, Mexico, and Canada to be one big "country" (or area, or whatever they called it) as a step to erasing borders. I don't care whose idea this is, but no thanks. We need to protect our borders, not erase them and welcome in a bunch of liberal nutbags. We have enough of those as it is. eyes Commiefornia