Looks legit - this from the kten article: “Section 1155 is a quintessential grant of discretion,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a President Joe Biden appointee, wrote in the decision. “The Secretary ‘may’ revoke a previously approved visa petition ‘at any time’ for what the Secretary deems ‘good and sufficient cause.’ Congress did not impose specific criteria or conditions limiting this authority, nor did it prescribe how or when the Secretary must act.”
So basically the secretary has the right to revoke previously approved visas (especially if he decides theres som shenanegans going on) and can then do what he wants. But the court affirmed that pretty much the secretary of immigration has a lot of leeway on how and when he enforces immigration visa laws.
PLEASE tell me this is real & NOT a shitpost..... Can you please post a link, OP?
https://www.kten.com/news/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may-pave-way-for-mass-deportation/article_e1591291-2ebf-5ac1-b7b6-8bfcd04ce8c5.html
I'm not finding any sauce on this, not even here.
Looks legit - this from the kten article: “Section 1155 is a quintessential grant of discretion,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a President Joe Biden appointee, wrote in the decision. “The Secretary ‘may’ revoke a previously approved visa petition ‘at any time’ for what the Secretary deems ‘good and sufficient cause.’ Congress did not impose specific criteria or conditions limiting this authority, nor did it prescribe how or when the Secretary must act.”
So basically the secretary has the right to revoke previously approved visas (especially if he decides theres som shenanegans going on) and can then do what he wants. But the court affirmed that pretty much the secretary of immigration has a lot of leeway on how and when he enforces immigration visa laws.