I think the main point U/BakasEverywhere is trying to make about feasibility still stands, though. The amount of mRNA you'd have to produce to be effective would be astronomical. my understanding is even simply spraying a chemical agent isn't as deadly as it's often made out to be (sounds terrifying of course), because whatever agent is used often has trouble achieving a lethal level in the air quick enough and long enough to kill more than a handful of people.
If they can achieve the same result by simply making vaccines/mRNA injections less scary, why bother?
Different groups are going for the big money contracts and have different ideas on how to do it. 'Vaccine hesitancy' goes beyond needles now. A significant account of those that submitted are becoming infertile and/or dying of horrific cancers, etc. The next targets won't be nearly as compliant; they already resisted a huge coordinated campaign of fear and force. That's why we're seeing different research groups claiming they can put it in food, in air, etc- competition. Any one of these may work or not, any might be 'most effective,' depending on the payload and intent. If the intent is to contaminate everyone possible in a region, perhaps with certain genetic exceptions, then maybe staying public spaces are enough. The haze-making sky sprays maybe can't be as targeted.
yeah, but sky sprays aren't nearly effective as they're made out to be, because achieving a concentration high enough to guarantee infection (for lack of a better word) is practically impossible. You'd be better off engineering a minor cold that naturally carries the dna into into cells and releasing it in a major airport, then sitting back and waiting. even then mutation and resistance are a thing.
short-term, filling the air might work in a densely filled, enclosed space, like a subway train or an er waiting room on a full moon, but it would take too long to achieve anything remotely viable in the open air. Long-term, it'd be impossible to maintain at any level high enough to achieve what you want, not to mention how do you protect yourself from your engineered bioweapon once it's out in the wild?
No, I didn't realize that all vaccines are now mRNA. I haven't been able to find anything that shows that. Other than comments on blogs and other social media sites, which I don't consider to be credible evidence.
Could you share where you got this information from, please? I don't have any problem admitting that my research skills aren't the best, so it's entirely possible that I've just missed it. So please don't take my request for your source negatively. I am honestly interested in whatever information you have that explains how all vaccines are mRNA now. Thanks. ✌️
That's a lot of effort into sarcasm to say one thing simply, sorry you feel so emotional on the topic. Here's something I am emotional about: murder.
For my part, as a biochemist I realize that the technology they're discussing is directly related to the housing of recombinant pieces of RNA AND DNA to stably enter the cells. As having awakened in the last decade and researched many late nights into Big Vaccines, I've come to the conclusion that none of the vaccines were ever functional nor safe, based on the lack of honest studies showing 'safe and effective' and the preponderance of studies that show disproportionate harm. Also, the documented fraud, lies, convictions and penalties paid by Big Vaccine shows they have no regard for life, and we cannot believe literally anything they say. In fact, I'd propose that we start with the opposite of what they say. Based on their own documentation.
So, we don't know anything about what's really in the vials. We don't know if ANY quality control has EVER been done. We believe they're manufactured by the lowest bidders, in places that don't like us. I don't care how many aerosolized 'vaccines' are released, there are many reasons to believe they will be harmful in many ways. MRNA is the latest tend, and execs like the latest trend (see failed spending on AI).
Antigens aren't in their "vaccines" anymore, do you not realize that? They coded mRNA for making spike proteins, which also wasn't an antigen.
I think the main point U/BakasEverywhere is trying to make about feasibility still stands, though. The amount of mRNA you'd have to produce to be effective would be astronomical. my understanding is even simply spraying a chemical agent isn't as deadly as it's often made out to be (sounds terrifying of course), because whatever agent is used often has trouble achieving a lethal level in the air quick enough and long enough to kill more than a handful of people.
If they can achieve the same result by simply making vaccines/mRNA injections less scary, why bother?
Thank you, that was exactly what my main point is. 🙂
Not a problem, username checks out, btw.
any chance I'm talking to a fellow rumiko takahashi fan? lol
Just a bit of a Japanophile. 😁
Different groups are going for the big money contracts and have different ideas on how to do it. 'Vaccine hesitancy' goes beyond needles now. A significant account of those that submitted are becoming infertile and/or dying of horrific cancers, etc. The next targets won't be nearly as compliant; they already resisted a huge coordinated campaign of fear and force. That's why we're seeing different research groups claiming they can put it in food, in air, etc- competition. Any one of these may work or not, any might be 'most effective,' depending on the payload and intent. If the intent is to contaminate everyone possible in a region, perhaps with certain genetic exceptions, then maybe staying public spaces are enough. The haze-making sky sprays maybe can't be as targeted.
yeah, but sky sprays aren't nearly effective as they're made out to be, because achieving a concentration high enough to guarantee infection (for lack of a better word) is practically impossible. You'd be better off engineering a minor cold that naturally carries the dna into into cells and releasing it in a major airport, then sitting back and waiting. even then mutation and resistance are a thing.
short-term, filling the air might work in a densely filled, enclosed space, like a subway train or an er waiting room on a full moon, but it would take too long to achieve anything remotely viable in the open air. Long-term, it'd be impossible to maintain at any level high enough to achieve what you want, not to mention how do you protect yourself from your engineered bioweapon once it's out in the wild?
No, I didn't realize that all vaccines are now mRNA. I haven't been able to find anything that shows that. Other than comments on blogs and other social media sites, which I don't consider to be credible evidence.
Could you share where you got this information from, please? I don't have any problem admitting that my research skills aren't the best, so it's entirely possible that I've just missed it. So please don't take my request for your source negatively. I am honestly interested in whatever information you have that explains how all vaccines are mRNA now. Thanks. ✌️
That's a lot of effort into sarcasm to say one thing simply, sorry you feel so emotional on the topic. Here's something I am emotional about: murder.
For my part, as a biochemist I realize that the technology they're discussing is directly related to the housing of recombinant pieces of RNA AND DNA to stably enter the cells. As having awakened in the last decade and researched many late nights into Big Vaccines, I've come to the conclusion that none of the vaccines were ever functional nor safe, based on the lack of honest studies showing 'safe and effective' and the preponderance of studies that show disproportionate harm. Also, the documented fraud, lies, convictions and penalties paid by Big Vaccine shows they have no regard for life, and we cannot believe literally anything they say. In fact, I'd propose that we start with the opposite of what they say. Based on their own documentation.
So, we don't know anything about what's really in the vials. We don't know if ANY quality control has EVER been done. We believe they're manufactured by the lowest bidders, in places that don't like us. I don't care how many aerosolized 'vaccines' are released, there are many reasons to believe they will be harmful in many ways. MRNA is the latest tend, and execs like the latest trend (see failed spending on AI).
There was zero sarcasm in that post. I went out of my way to tell you I sincerely was interested in learning more about it.