Also, I was being tongue-in-cheek with this one (maybe like the pilot), but I really am very cynical about nuclear fear porn. More invisible things to keep us in fear. (Supposedly visible I suppose, but legally protected from view.)
I can say with absolute certainty "nukes" are real. Nuclear warheads, missile and weapons are very real. It's incredible folks can go all out flat earth style on this topic. You should understand and read up what nuke really means and refers to and unpack the nuts and bolts of it then its no longer fear porn.
In short its simply physics and the destabilizing (splitting or joining) of atoms of particular elements, atomic event creating chain reactions that occur from either fission or fusion.
Yes, big bombs exist and shouldn't be taken lightly. Chemistry and physics are real. Even so, both fields have had both fraud and honest errors that have persisted, sometimes waiting decades to be corrected. I've only said that nuclear weapons aren't what they are presented as. Seriously: suitcase nukes? And yet you'll find many references to them in news articles.
If nuclear power was as dangerous as portrayed, would the last summer Olympic torch-bearers in Japan have run through the Fukushima area? Has anyone documented radiation damage in the animals or fish there? Is Chernobyl a wasteland today? Was it ever?
There's very credible evidence that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not single-bomb events, but instead saturation firebombing followed by a very successful propaganda campaign. But you have to care enough and be skeptical enough to look; all governments are happy to keep the fear alive the same way cancer institutes have a vested interest in not finding a cure. The surface explanations keep most everyone from digging deeper.
Galen Winsor has given good talks on how protocols were created to ramp up and compartmentalize fear related to nuclear power plants.
It's a film reel. Get more popcorn.
I don't think that's a film reel...
Also, I was being tongue-in-cheek with this one (maybe like the pilot), but I really am very cynical about nuclear fear porn. More invisible things to keep us in fear. (Supposedly visible I suppose, but legally protected from view.)
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IElxMNc4/nukes-and-truth-more-in-comments/c/
I can say with absolute certainty "nukes" are real. Nuclear warheads, missile and weapons are very real. It's incredible folks can go all out flat earth style on this topic. You should understand and read up what nuke really means and refers to and unpack the nuts and bolts of it then its no longer fear porn.
In short its simply physics and the destabilizing (splitting or joining) of atoms of particular elements, atomic event creating chain reactions that occur from either fission or fusion.
Yes, big bombs exist and shouldn't be taken lightly. Chemistry and physics are real. Even so, both fields have had both fraud and honest errors that have persisted, sometimes waiting decades to be corrected. I've only said that nuclear weapons aren't what they are presented as. Seriously: suitcase nukes? And yet you'll find many references to them in news articles.
If nuclear power was as dangerous as portrayed, would the last summer Olympic torch-bearers in Japan have run through the Fukushima area? Has anyone documented radiation damage in the animals or fish there? Is Chernobyl a wasteland today? Was it ever?
There's very credible evidence that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not single-bomb events, but instead saturation firebombing followed by a very successful propaganda campaign. But you have to care enough and be skeptical enough to look; all governments are happy to keep the fear alive the same way cancer institutes have a vested interest in not finding a cure. The surface explanations keep most everyone from digging deeper.
Galen Winsor has given good talks on how protocols were created to ramp up and compartmentalize fear related to nuclear power plants.