Former Air Force Employee Captures Four F-16s Chasing Something—Zoomed-In Footage Shows a Glowing Object That’s No Drone (VIDEO)
(www.usasupreme.com)
PRJ. BLUE BEAM
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
As someone who's been abducted, met aliens, has a family history of alien experiments and seen many UFOs, I can confirm that's a flying spaceship.
That's not a drone or a plane, it's either an angel or spaceship.
Now go ahead and downvote me like y'all normally do because I dared talk about alien abductions, even though Q already confirmed the existent of aliens...
Well, FWIW you have one person here who believes you because while I haven't had experiences of your magnitude, I've had plenty of weird ones and spent a few decades researching and interviewing.
There is a long history of these energy shaped craft that often change shape into more traditional flying disks then back again.
On a thread about the drones from around a week ago, I put up a long comment after talking with an agency friend. At the time, we were both leaning towards a "broken arrow" situation, but the other scenario was this:
(From my comment a week ago):
"Interestingly, the other theory he mentioned is that these drones could be a response to real UAP's in the area. As some of you know, there is a long history of UFO's/UAP's being seen by citizens where within 5 minutes, there are either military helicopters or military jets on the scene in hot pursuit.
As he put it: "That scenario has happened countless times over the years. There are certain types of UAP's/UFO's the military has deemed as undesirables and they want them chased away, to say nothing of the public exposure when one of those suckers just sits over a town with everyone to see.
So they want to chase them away, but the problem is you've gotta scramble jets or helicopters for that and they need pilots, pilots that may not be quickly available in the middle of the night. So there's some logic in having a drone swarm with high loiter times to do the chasing for you, especially if you can leverage a combination of AI and manual control."
Drones? Chasing UFOs? Isn't that a bit like slugs chasing a cheetah? If I were a UFO, I would simply run rings about them, or continue my operations at altitudes where the drones cannot fly. (And that would not need to be very high, since these are nearly nap-of-the-earth drones.)
And yet there are innumerable accounts from confirmed military personnel of jets and helicopters chasing UFOs/UAPs.
It is presumptuous to call them nap of the earth drones. Plenty of them over NJ have been at higher altitudes. Regardless, modern military drones possess flight characteristics on par with military copters. Far more convenient and with a shorter response time to release AI-guided drones to chase away non-human undesirables than risk human pilots who were just roused from bed.
How high? If they are low enough to be seen and potentially collide with tall buildings, they are low altitude (under 1000 ft).
How, exactly, would drones chase away anything that can outrun them by factor of 10 or greater? You have too much confidence in AI. I did target discrimination software development for a living. AI killed 346 passengers and crew in the 737 MAX crashes, by making bad decisions. Something like an AWACS would be more pertinent.