Thank you for the link. I have read the entire document. It cites numerous quotes throughout the centuries that mention Christianity, in historical documents from the 1600s and in documents of individual states, but the Supreme Court opinion itself limited itself to saying that “this is a religious nation.” It certainly made clear that it would be inappropriate to legislate against Christian religious bodies, but it stopped short of declaring the United States a Christian nation.
In actuality, the United States federal government was founded by masonic deists who have gone to great lengths to blur the important distinction between their false religion and Christianity. The Supreme Court opinion tiptoes around this fact. I’m glad they defended Christianity as they did, and the citations they quoted, but they couldn’t directly declare the nation to be Christian, because that’s absolutely not the case.
Thank you for the link. I have read the entire document. It cites numerous quotes throughout the centuries that mention Christianity, in historical documents from the 1600s and in documents of individual states, but the Supreme Court opinion itself limited itself to saying that “this is a religious nation.” It certainly made clear that it would be inappropriate to legislate against Christian religious bodies, but it stopped short of declaring the United States a Christian nation.
In actuality, the United States federal government was founded by masonic deists who have gone to great lengths to blur the important distinction between their false religion and Christianity. The Supreme Court opinion tiptoes around this fact. I’m glad they defended Christianity as they did, and the citations they quoted, but they couldn’t directly declare the nation to be Christian, because that’s absolutely not the case.